User talk:Revived

Welcome to my talk page.

Comments related to Phonebooking or the VfD[edit]

... have been moved to User_talk:Revived/Phonebooking.

De Moivre's formula[edit]

wouldn't this more aptly be called De Moivre's Theorem?-- Revived 04:25, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The standard name is De Moivre's formula and there is nothing we can do about it. You are right, it is a theorem. Oleg Alexandrov 04:29, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Collaboration of the Week[edit]

League of Nations is the new Collaboration of the Week. Please join in helping make it a feature article.

Hello![edit]

Just saying hello, from one Waterloo student to another. There are a few UW students around here, in case you're interested. Looking at the page history of the University of Waterloo article is a good place to find them! Good work on the Keith Geddes article. If you work with the Maple group you might want to seriously expand the article on Maple, as I think it's lacking a bit now. Cheers. CryptoDerk 03:02, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)

Baron Black of Crossharbour[edit]

Hi! Agree with you about the CB article. Go for it. Caveat: this is ongoing news, so it's difficult to write a well-developed article. Perhaps limiting yourself to a chronology of events related to Hollinger. This would be factual and NPOV.

The article could be organized like this, for instance. (short intro) 1. Early life 2. Press career 3. Published works 4. Marriage to Barbara Amiel and social life 5. Hollinger chronology

You might want to examine different aspects of the man; he's fascinating. Got expelled from UCC (or LCC?) for selling essays to classmates. Black (an anglo!) wrote one of the best political bios of any French Canadian politician, "Duplessis". He (a right wing capitalist!) wrote perhaps the best single volume bio of FDR, in unabashed praise of the New Deal. He's also active on the social scenes attending lots of parties with the Rich and Famous. Infamously attended a costume party dressed as Cardinal Richelieu. People tend to avoid sitting next to him at dinner because he bores listeners with endless statistics on, say, the exact number of ships wrecked ashore when the Spanish Armada foundered in the 16th century. And then he names and descibes each ship. I'd consider doing it myself, but no time for the research. Good luck. Vincent 04:34, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

FEDS[edit]

Sorry, I am just a PhD student at UW, I did my undergrad in the states, so I know nothing about anything that goes on at UW. Good luck with the article, looks good thus far. CryptoDerk 03:10, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)

Referring to students' unions[edit]

I would probably use they vs it, it sounds really... impersonal. Whichever you decide to use, make sure it's consistant in the article. --Spinboy 04:20, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User:211.160.80.35[edit]

He got his warning, so I'm watching to see if he vandalizes again. If he does, I'll block him. – Clockwork Soul 03:10, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Well, he didn't heed the warnings, so he's blocked for 24 hours. – Clockwork Soul 03:18, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

RuneScape cheats[edit]

Your help with fixing the vandalism is very appreciated. Currently JAGex is trying to delete the article with an AFD recommendation. Please take a minute and comment on the talk page so that the article can be improved instead of removed.Jonathan888 (talk) 15:18, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Block on 129.97.58.55[edit]

I unblocked 129.97.58.55, so you should be safe to log in again. Owen× ☎ 19:01, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, 48 hours was definitely excessive. // Pathoschild 00:06, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

User:68.171.249.212[edit]

He stopped vandalizing after you warned him. If he continues, issue a final ({{test3}} or {{test4}}) warning and alert me. Thanks! Owen× ☎ 00:20, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

malo's RfA[edit]

Thank you!

Revived, thanks for your support on my RFA. I was rather suprised at the overwhelming support I received. Thank you for your confidence in me. I hope that I'll live up to your expectations in the future as well. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 05:42, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Wolf[edit]

I reverted the article back to the original text by Harry Alexander Glockler, following vandalism by User:81.96.2.3. Please may I restore this original text. 195.92.67.68 17:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've done it anyway. 195.92.67.71 23:40, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CVU CfD[edit]

Category:User_Wikipedia/Counter Vandalism Unit, which is related to this article, has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion. You are encouraged to join the discussion.

Katie Holmes[edit]

Greetings! You have edited the Katie Holmes page in the past. I've completely reworked the article and have posted it on WP:PR in the hopes of advancing it to WP:FAC. I would be grateful for your comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Katie Holmes/archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 18:44, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-automated link sorting[edit]

This page was semi-automatically modified to sort links to Pathoschild in a meaningful way. // Pathoschild (_admin / ^talk) 06:41, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi & feedback requested[edit]

You welcomed me to Wikipedia last year with a note on my talk page. I was wondering if you have any specific feedback or suggestions for me, as we haven't corresponded since. Peter C Talk! 13:31, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status[edit]

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

uwstudent.org[edit]

Hey, we noticed that you added links to uwstudent.org to the Federation of Student article. It's a long shot, but do you know who ran this site? it seems to be gone now but we like to get in contact with them. Cheers! --Catologing UW's pranks and spirit throughout the years. spiritofwtf.com (talk) 20:13, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey[edit]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]