User talk:Stephan Leclercq

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stephan - I have responded to your question The coast of Britain ? Or is it Brittany ? on the Talk:Fractal page. Gandalf61 09:07, Aug 20, 2004 (UTC)

question about Kepler's law[edit]

I thnik that your comment about the Kepler's law deserve to be included in the article, that is that these laws have been used by Newton to derive the law of gravitation. I would like to know and understand how Kepler, thanks to his observations, found his laws, and then which derivations Newton used. THanks --Nicop 19:23, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Personal life in HP 41 extension[edit]

I don't think this statement about personal life was meant as a joke. IMHO, it meant that the time function could be used outside of programs, e.g. as an alarm clock, or stop watch. Thyl Engelhardt 213.70.217.172 (talk) 07:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Thyl, but in the same edit, he also added very unencyclopedic delirium tremens induced nonsense... --Stephan Leclercq (talk) 10:52, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Jean-Pierre Petit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks secondary, independent, reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.