User talk:Shlomital

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Castle master-cga.png[edit]

You uploaded a new version of Image:Castle master-cga.png. It is visually identical, but with a slightly larger file size. Your summary of the change was "fixed palette to unrounded 8-bit values, added sBIT chunk". I'm not familiar with the PNG specification, what does this mean in? Was the previous version not a strictly valid PNG? boffy_b 14:44, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, it needs explanation, but I couldn't do the proper link to where it's all summarised. I wanted to link to Image:IBM16_Palette_Map.png (mine, on the Commons). The section "Orthopraxy" should make clear why I uploaded a new version. The changes are: values 54, A8 and FC for the colours are corrected to 55, AA and FF respectively, and an sBIT chunk is added to indicate that the original palette has a 2-bit range. The previous version was a strictly valid PNG (if it hadn't been, the browser couldn't have rendered it - the PNG standard, unlike TIFF, leaves little room for playing around with the internals). Finally, the difference is just a little over 60 bytes, which I think is in our day and age negligible. Sorry for my failure to provide the explanatory link. --Shlomi Tal 14:20, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Additions in the List of palettes article[edit]

Hello, I did some improvements to the article List of palettes, that I think you will find fine, I hope. There are new hardware palettes for Amstrad CPC, MSX and MSX2, and the full combinations of the CGA palettes.

I was a professional videogames programmer and graphic designer in the last 80's and early 90's, and I have a lot of info and background on the matter. Some machines I worked with Sinclair ZX Spectrum, Amstrad CPC series, MSX, Commodore C-64, Atari ST, Commodore Amiga, and IBM PC with Hercules, CGA, EGA, VGA, SVGA (256 and 32768 colors) and AT&T Vista, among others. You can find my profile in internet.

Yours,Ricardo Cancho Niemietz 11:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't logged in for a long time, hence the delay of months in reading and replying. Thanks much, Ricardo. Your work on the List of palettes page is amazing! --Shlomi Tal 11:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most useful userpage ever. 68.39.174.238 18:13, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Shlomi Tal 18:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would have to agree. If found this page quite useful when trying to figure out how to deal with zTXt in PNG images. The comment about tweakpng was extremely helpful! Jaryth000 12:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Qb45.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Qb45.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Windows2000.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Windows2000.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MSDOS Edit.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:MSDOS Edit.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dogcow.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dogcow.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Am windows95 desktop.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Am windows95 desktop.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Adobepdfreader7 icon.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Adobepdfreader7 icon.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:C64 Great Giana Sisters.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:C64 Great Giana Sisters.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:C64 Boulder Dash.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:C64 Boulder Dash.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Nt4server.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Nt4server.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:43, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your PETSCII screenshots need revision[edit]

I am on the verge of modifying & replacing the screenshots of the C-64 at startup, and which display the PETSCII values of a few of the bytes passed to the Commodore PRINT routine. You appear to be the author of those screenshots, and you appear to have used a C-64 emulator program to test your theory, and make the designs.

The point I wish to make, is simply that Commodore programmers usually achieved the lowercase/uppercase character mode by switching to "text" mode on first passing chr$(14) to the BASIC print routine, and then they arrived at the uppercase by passing bytes with bit 7 set, something that you may not have realized when you did your screenshots. It was highly unusual to OR a character in the range of $41 to $5A byte with $20, to reach the mirrored images at $61-7A.

In other words,

10 PRINT CHR$(14)  : REM FIRST SWITCH TO UPPERCASE/LOWERCASE TEXT MODE
20
30 FOR N=1 TO 26
40 PRINT CHR$(N OR 64 OR 128)  : REM PRINT UPPERCASE CHARACTERS
50 NEXT
60
70 END

is a better BASIC listing for testing and displaying your theory about PETSCII uppercase characters. Dexter Nextnumber (talk) 01:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Dbaseshot.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dbaseshot.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:55, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What image compression program did you use for this image?[edit]

Hi, I'd just like to know what program you used to compress this picture: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:LossyDemonstration-98less.jpg Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.182.127.104 (talk) 19:03, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:LossyDemonstration-Original.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:LossyDemonstration-Original.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (tc) 20:58, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dogcow.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Dogcow.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An Arabic page on the commons?[edit]

Could you please tell me if this image is a publisher's logo? Am asking because I am categorizing Publisher logos on Mediawiki Commons. Thanks. — Ineuw talk