User talk:Ebeisher

Hello "Ebeisher" and welcome to Wikipedia. A few tips for you:

Peruse Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers and associated pages.
You can experiment in the Wikipedia:Sandbox.
Sign talk page entries with ~~~~, which is automatically converted to a name and date.
Ask questions on Wikipedia:Village pump.

Note that I moved your "EBeisher" page to User:Ebeisher, as personal pages go in the "User:" space.

Happy wikipediaing, -- Infrogmation 21:37, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)

It is a pity that you removed the other canary from the picture I uploaded, it was already sad that she died some time ago :-( Flyingbird 20:22, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)

"And that's when I shot him, your honor" →Raul654 05:15, Mar 21, 2004 (UTC)

Your honour, that is what Raul claims, I just uploaded the picture including the breeding female canary again, the caption of that image in the article still said that there was a breeding female, Sir! Flyingbird 21:02, 30 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you said "Has anyone considered or heard of using Wiki to develop a complete Family tree? Imagine from Adam & Eve to present day..." The WikiTree project has ambitions of achieving something like that - have a look and consider joining the community to realize the dream. --Tjfulopp 05:21, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Male and Female images[edit]

Hi Ebeisher,

I've just uploaded two images, Image:Male.png and Image:Female.png, because I thought that Image:Male.JPG and Image:Female.JPG looked a little scratchy. I hope that's alright with you (and I don't wish to demean your artistic abilities!).

Thanks, — Asbestos | Talk 15:31, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Tudor style[edit]

Hi as you started the above page perhaps you would like to comment on the idea proposed here [1]. Regards Giano | talk 12:21, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Female.JPG has been listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Female.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--Bash 21:56, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Empty youth soccer articles[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you've been creating a lot of youth soccer league articles that have no content. Please do not create numerous empty pages on purpose. If you plan on adding content later, try focusing on one article at a time. Write the text offline so that you can just create the article when you are done and paste in the text. This way there aren't a bunch of empty pages floating around. Also, the {{stub}} tag is deprecated. Try categorizing stubs in the future. — Indi ^{[ talk ]} 16:07, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, use {{Footy-org-stub}} instead of {{stub}}. --Malthusian (talk) 22:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The "articles" have now been around for three days. I will speedy delete the entries if not expanded with text soon. See WP:CSD, specifically criterion A3. Punkmorten 14:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Muir-beach.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Muir-beach.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Stan 22:10, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ambulance.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ambulance.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:49, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LOTG[edit]

A template you created, Template:LOTG, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --MZMcBride 23:28, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Lady-of-auxerre.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Lady-of-auxerre.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 00:37, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Laon-cathedral.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on Image:Laon-cathedral.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [2], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Laon-cathedral.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - AWeenieMan (talk) 17:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of HOMer Award[edit]

A tag has been placed on HOMer Award requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Skomorokh 01:33, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikicanary2.JPG missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Wikicanary2.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Integrated Workplace Management System[edit]

A tag has been placed on Integrated Workplace Management System, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - sinneed (talk) 03:47, 31 July 2009 (UTC) I killed the speedy, and replaced it with some flags.- sinneed (talk) 03:54, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Male.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Male.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:21, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:21, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pistol.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pistol.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:14, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Wikicanary2.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Wikicanary2.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:54, 31 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:54, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of External Security Manager[edit]

The article External Security Manager has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Importance not asserted; no references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. H.dryad (talk) 19:56, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of VeoRide[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on VeoRide requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 00:07, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Professional Soccer Referees Association moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Professional Soccer Referees Association. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:21, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Professional Soccer Referees Association[edit]

Hello, Ebeisher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Professional Soccer Referees Association, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Professional Soccer Referees Association[edit]

Hello, Ebeisher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Professional Soccer Referees Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]