User talk:Trick

Welcome!

Hello, Trick, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 21:03, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)

Duboce Triangle[edit]

Seems like there may be no such thing as an "official" neighborhood definition in S.F. Or at least the borders are really blurry.

The city website has a pulldown box listing neighborhoods, which then hilight a map - it puts most of Duboce Triangle in "Castro]]/Upper Market", with the blocks north of Duboce in in Western Addition. I lived in the 'pointy end' of the triangle for a while, and never knew exactly what to call it. The blocks around the Mint definitely have a different character than the Lower Haight. It's not really The Castro, and on the wrong side of Market to be Mission District. Living there, I got mail from the Hayes Valley neighboorhood association, but it seems a really stretch to lump it in to that neighborhood. I did find one website which called it "TriBeSa" for "TRiangle BEhind SAfeway". But calling that end of the triangle Mint Hill seemed like the best option.

But this Duboce Triangle Neighborhood Association map does exclude the Mint and the houses directly north. It suprises me - the blocks west of Buchanan between Herman and Waller seem entirely in the character of the Duboce Triangle area. And that map makes the triangle not a triangle.... But I'll change the text. --Key45

I like the change. And it does seem the borders are blurry. I now live in the TL and no one has a precise definition for either, it seems.

Kristin Hersh article edits[edit]

Thanks for your attention to the KH article I have been working on. I am trying to improve my contributions and hope to invite collaboration from any folks who are interested in researching the same subject matter. I don't know if you've heard this artist's music before but perhaps you have, as she is based in California these days. Emerman 07:20, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Chemical warfare[edit]

Thanks! Also, since you've done some work on chemical warfare, I thought you might be interested to know that I've nominated it to Featured article candidates. I was hoping you would take a look at what we've done, and maybe help me perfect the article into something that we can all be truly proud of. -- Clockwork Soul 02:13, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Blitz[edit]

Sorry, forgot that you posted on my talk page. I am not too attached to Ballroom Blitz - Que Sera Sera. -- ALoan (Talk) 23:17, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Honorifics and titles[edit]

I have posted a proposal on honorifics in my user space that I would like you to read: User:Ford/proposals. Your comments on Talk:2004 suggest that you might be supportive, though I am not certain how far you would go. Thanks.
— Ford 23:08, 2005 Jan 15 (UTC)

Return of the Untagged Image project[edit]

You were kind enough to contribute to the Wikipedia:Untagged images project; I beg to draw your attention to part 2 of the project - there are about 12,000 more images in need of tagging. Any assistance you could provide would be most welcome. thanks --Tagishsimon (talk)

An apology[edit]

Hello, just wanted to say I mistakenly tried to log on as your username. I use the handle 'trick' myself on a couple of web forums. Not until after I had clicked "email new password" did I recognize my mistake. Hope this doesn't cause you any trouble. My sincere apologies.

Proposed deletion of Zedtone Records[edit]

The article Zedtone Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability guidelines of either WP:CORP or WP:MUSIC

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PK T(alk) 15:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Donnybrook (movement)[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Donnybrook (movement), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Donnybrook. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:44, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Donnybrook (movement)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Donnybrook (movement) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 18:52, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michelle Hurst[edit]

The article Michelle Hurst has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only one notable role, and it's a very recent one. Article contains no useful information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 23:12, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]