User talk:Võrok

Hi Võrolang, do you speak the Võro language? If yes, would you be interested in a Wikipedia in Võro language? If yes, post your proposal here: [1]. Greetings and best wishes for you and your language -- CdaMVvWgS 16:16, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Hi! Yes, I'm a native speaker of Võro. Thank you! Maybe I'll try to do Wikipedia in Võro. Best wishes! Võrolang.

Image Tagging Image:Voromkaart.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Voromkaart.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 08:02, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

This image Image:Voromkaart.jpg has taken from home page of Võro Institute and it is also created by Võro Institute. I'm working in this institute and have permission to use it freely. --Võrolang 13:23, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Translation Help

Hy there,

i'm in a bit of a problem. Where on the Internet can i find a good estonian to english translation site ?

Or, even better, where can i find someone to help me translate en estonian site ?

I'm doing research on the Estonian Civil Protection services, but don't speak the language. Ain't that a break.

Cheers and thanx for all the help that you can send my way. Miguel

It's better to ask in Estonian Wikipedia [[2]]. I'am dealing more with Võro language. --Võrolang 09:32, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

47 in Võro

Hi, I am collecting translations for the number 47 (forty-seven). So far I have 509 translations, which you can see here. Can you help and tell me how to say and write 47 in Võro? I'd be most thankful; please reply on my talk page. Thank you! — N-true 14:49, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I am sorry, I noticed your message just now, 15 years later. 47 in Võro is nelikümmend säidse.--Võrok (talk) 14:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Talk:South Estonian dialects has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 23:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Uralic languages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 14:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Your edits are being discussed at WP:COIN

Hello Võrok. See the discussion at WP:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Advice needed. It has been suggested that you are editing Wikipedia articles to reflect the POV of an organization you belong to. You are welcome to provide your side of the story in that discussion. Since I know nothing at all about this dispute, and the readers of WP:COIN may be in the same situation, perhaps you can provide some general background to allow us to understand the dispute. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. The discussion is going on on the talk pages of the articles Võro language and South Estonian language. You can find there also my explanations.--Võrok (talk) 09:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Võrok. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Võrok. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tilde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Võro. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of TimedText:Pink Floyd Several Species.ogg.vro.srt

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that TimedText:Pink Floyd Several Species.ogg.vro.srt, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
• It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:45, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for the message. First of all, these Võro subtitles reflect really the way how the absurd and surrealstic text of this piece of song sounds for me, a Võro-speaking person. Well, of course I really didn't mean anything very serious making these subtitles. My idea was to illustrate an absurd and surrealistic thing adding to it a detail (subtitles to part of the song that does have not any meaningful text) that would seem also absurd, needless, meaningless, surrealistic. So, yes it is rather a joke than a very serious act. I do not think these subtitles with the meaning I just explained harm the audio example or the article, on the countrary, I think they contribute to them in a positive way. But if it really seems to be something so negative that should be deleted.. well, I am a bit sad about it and would like at least to contest that oppinion. But I did not find on the linked page a button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". It is not a very serious and important thing for me but I just woud like to explain my motives by the contesting (that I was unable to do), as I did it here.--Võrok (talk) 09:44, 5 June 2023 (UTC)