User talk:Bontenbal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Bontenbal and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!

Mahdi / Mahdi army[edit]

copied from User talk:Leo Africanus

Hello Leo, I was wondering whether you would know more on the Mahdi Army and the Mahdi. From the name, it looks that the 2004 Army is inspired on the religious belief of the returning Mahdi. Do you have any sources on this one? Thanks in advance, Bontenbal 21:06, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

The Mahdi is the Islamic/Muslim word for Messiah. And with the Shia thread in Islam being more strongly Messianic than the Sunni half, the name "Mahdi Army" for a "militia" is like calling a Christian equivalent the "Army of Jesus", or, say, the Jesuits?—iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 22:04, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC)
Well, on the Mahdi article I read that Twelver Shia Muslims believe he will return at the end of time and will help to defeat the false messiah... Somewhere else I read that he will be assisted on this by an army, but I'm not sure where I read this... On Christian eschatology, many Christians believe that on the final day there will be a battle between the true believers and the false believers. I don't know how that army is called, though. Thanks for your comments. Bontenbal 22:41, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
copied from User talk:Leo Africanus
Hi Bontenball. IFaqeer's observation is spot on. However, you are right in suggesting that the name given to the militia is inspired by the Mahdi's role in Shi'a eschatology. I understand that al-Sadr is of the view that the Mahdi's return from occultation is imminent. As a descendent of the Imams and a scion of a well-established scholarly family perhaps he feels obliged to raise such an army. Reports suggest that he claims the army "belongs to the Mahdi".Leo Africanus 18:56, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Netherland position[edit]

I saw you had removed netherland from Hezbollah article. I don't revert your edition. But come and write your idea in talk:hezbollah please. Thanks--Sa.vakilian 05:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia#Accuracy_and_comprehensiveness[edit]

Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Wikipedia#Accuracy_and_comprehensiveness are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! -- Jeff G. 19:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Research survey invitation[edit]

Greetings Bontenbal-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:

https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss

Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.

This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.

If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 03:43, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bontenbal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bontenbal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bontenbal&oldid=869678368"