User talk:Pethr

Archive | Signposts

C H I L E

The origen of the Chilean population is spaniard, (to see demography of Chile ) the Chile economy does not have a 58% of poverty, is impossible with the entrance per capita and the HDI of Chile.

MY SOURCES:

1.- UNIVERSITY OF CHILE [[1]]

2,. THE WORLD VALUES WORLD CHILE 2006 [[2]]

3.- SPAIN GOV. [[3]]

4.- CIA [[4]]

' Antarcticwik 02:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)'

Refs message

Hi Pethr,

Thanks for the message on my talk page. However, I'm not sure what references you are referring to. Could you give an example of an article you mean?

Just to point out that the section you mentioned explicitly says:

The use of Citation templates is not required by WP:CITE and is neither encouraged nor discouraged by any other Wikipedia citation guidelines. They may be used at the discretion of individual editors, subject to agreement with the other editors on the article. Some editors find them helpful, while other editors find them annoying"

I have personally imporved the quality of my citations significantly since I started editing but I've never been a fan of the templates - often they are simply inappropriate for the news website sources I normally use. The one thing I do find useful however is the "accessed on" bit, which I may start using now. AndrewRT(Talk) 00:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Replace.js

You're welcome. I'm glad you found it useful on Mac OS X. Hopefully we'll be seeing that at WP:FAC someday? Gimmetrow 05:28, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

re: bangladesh cartoon

hi, that image indeed was originally published in the times of India, but I downloaded it from Bharat Rakshak's fictional newspaper "The Liberation Times" which isn't a paper but more of a commemorative piece of the 71 war. The cartoonist is R.K. Laxman a renowned Indian persona who has always drawn cartoons for the "Times of India" publications only. It appears that "Liberation Times" took permission from the original authors and reproduced them. I took it from the reproduced site, and have mentioned that as my source, but it was published (literally) only in the Times of India. Hope I haven't confused you! Idleguy 03:31, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: User talk:Kman618

I had been trying to rv his vandalism through Lupin's tool but kept running into edit conflicts so I assumed something was afoot.. after several tries I just watched the article and it seemed stable in its non-vandalized state so I went to his talk page, saw a previous message for vandalism, and posted a warning. I would have posted test2 for "nonsense" but I upped it to test3 for previous vandalism. I hadn't realized that he self-reverted, thanks for catching that --froth^{T C} 06:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Anti-Vandal

Thank you for the suggestion on my talk page. Camw 03:00, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Sweet Sixteen

Why did you undo my edits?

      A car is a very traditional gift in America for a 16 year old to get a car on their birthday, as this is when they can get license to drive in many states. – 72.128.4.236

A car is a very traditional gift in America for a 16 year old to get a car on their birthday, as this is when they can get license to drive in many states. – 72.128.4.236

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Hotel Habana Libre Josef Zieleniec Jack Welch Iran crisis Ear Multi-speed Europe IDVD Foreign relations of the European Union Robert Keohane Portuguese Wikipedia Institutionalism in international relations Pacific Union Christian Democratic Party of Cuba Popular Unity James Cason Font Book Susan McDougal Hongkonger Faustin Twagiramungu

Cleanup Operation Colombo Alex Rodriguez Neoliberalism in international relations Merge Unification of Germany Assignat Wagga Wagga, New South Wales Add Sources Georgy Malenkov William A. Wheeler Cocktail Wars Wikify Yushau Shuaib Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan Interstate compact Expand Maggie Cheung Realpolitik Gemeindeordnung

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba 14:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you...

Thank you for your edits in regard to Yemen. Jidan 19:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Dovrefjell-Sunndalsfjella national Park

Hey, why did you exchange (and not add) the picture?

I suppose its good behaviour to ask the one who added the former picture before you do such things. If not, you better add and not remove photos placed by others, unless you hav good reasons (i.e. your picture iss better, more relevant and so on)

Anyway, I do not fully agree that the Musk ox is a better illustration. Its a introduced species, more a curiosity than an important part of the ecosystem. It was irrelvant to the descisison to protect the area. It is the reindeer and the almost complete moountain ecosystem that is the reason for the protection, so a good reindeer photo would be more relevant. But that is a very much more difficult task than photographing musk ox!

My illustration is relevant because this is the only place such a monument is raised, it is easy accesssible to visitors, so I'll put it back. (Carl S. Bj 08:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)) (talk • contribs)

Ann Bradstreet

If you go to the cited page, search for "Bradstreet". The first occurance on that page is Gov. Simon Bradstreet, and Ann Dudley, listed there, was his wife. I can't imagine why you'd have trouble finding it. -Nunh-huh 05:18, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

re: vandalism

Ah, thanks for noticing. --froth^T 02:47, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

I saw your defense of User talk:69.94.170.116 and would like to draw your attention to further vandalism: Oedipus Can he be blocked now? --In Defense of the Artist 20:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

President vs. president

I noticed you reverted my edit changing president to President in the article Bill Clinton. I've just reverted back. Since it would be completely inane to get in a revert war over one letter, let me explain. The manual style states thus, "the correct formal name of an office is treated as a proper noun." In fact, in the sentence, "Before his election as president," it is referring only to his election as President of the United States, not as a generic president. But, to make the sentence clearer, I changed the sentence to, "Before his election as the President," using the definite article to refer to one and only President of the United States. However, even without an article, the reference was clearly to the President of the US, warranting a capital. I believe you have misinterpreted WP:MS#Titles in that you do not capitalize the generic president. Even if he were elected to President of the Local County Bar, you would capitalize the P. Anyways, it's silly, so to make certain it was clear which president, I used the definite article. Orangemarlin 08:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Czech Republic

Zakládáme WikiProject Czech Republic, možná bys mohl mít zájem, podívej se prosím [5] a hlasuj pro vytvoření. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 10:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Jako lobby spis ne, jde nam o to, dat clanky o ceskem prostredi pod jednu strechu a dat jim jistou formu. Napriklad jsou tu clanky o Grossmanovi a Simkovi, ale uz napriklad chybi Semafor atd. Vsichni okolo (Nemci, Polaci, Rakusane, Madari...) uz WP maji, akorat my jeste porad ne. Vzhledem k poctu ceskych editoru tady je kazdy hlas a kazdy participant dulezity jako sul. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 09:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Ok, duvody zni jako rozumne. Pouzivani narodnich jazyku na talk page je v norme a siroce rozsirene, co byva odmitano a s cim je problem je ne-anglictina na oficialnich talk page (napriklad ta k projektu) ;) Doufam, ze se projekt nestane tim co mu bylo predpovezeno, a ze se pak pripojite. Btw. talk page archivuji kazdych 8-15 prispevku, neb je pak dlouha, odkazy mam na hlavni strance. Diskuse u Waldemara je plna emoci z toho duvodu, ze to neni prvni spor tohoto druhu s tim stejnym clovekem. Navrhovali jsme kompromis, ktery splnuje WP a to nazev clanku s diakritikou a anglicky redirect. Precijen bez hacku a carek je tam jista ztrata informace, ktera je pro encyklopedii skoda. Tento byl odmitnut a zadny protinavrh nebyl navrzen a cesta ke smiru se jevi jako nedostupnou. Podle vseho se ten clovek (rikejme mu Evzen) domniva, ze pouzivani diakritiky je pouze jista forma vyslovnosti a nebere v uvahu, ze se etn clovek tak skutecne jmenuje. Navic nejsme prvni, se kterymi vede tento spor. Toliko k pripadu Waldemar. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 18:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Diky za vstricnou odpoved. Vyjimecne odpovidam na vlastni talk strance, at uz v tom neni zmatek, snad si vsimnete ve watchlistu. Vy archivujete, Darwinek maze (a oba dost rychle, obvykle byva zvykem archivovat nejdrive po tydnu)... Co takhle nechat Waldemara kde je a vysvetlit, jak to s tim jmenem je v clanku? Kdyby Matuska dlouho nezil ve Statech, tak bych jeste pochopil, ze je o tom takovy spor, ale takhle mi skutecne nepripada jako problem, ze na anglicke wiki bude jmeno v takove forme, na kterou jsou v anglicky mluvicich zemich zvykli. Co myslite? docela me boli, ze ten clanek ma dve vety a talk page tisice znaku (nemluve o tom, kolik casu to stalo Vas a ostatni) a to vsechno docela zbytecne...--Pethr 18:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Presunul jsem toto sem, na talk page projektu to delalo zmatecnou situaci:

Jako lobby spis ne, jde nam o to, dat clanky o ceskem prostredi pod jednu strechu a dat jim jistou formu. Napriklad jsou tu clanky o Grossmanovi a Simkovi, ale uz napriklad chybi Semafor atd. Vsichni okolo (Nemci, Polaci, Rakusane, Madari...) uz WP maji, akorat my jeste porad ne. Vzhledem k poctu ceskych editoru tady je kazdy hlas a kazdy participant dulezity jako sul. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 09:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Přesunul jsem Váš komentář sem, protože se diskuze týká projektu a né jenom mě. To, co píšete, jsou určitě legtimní důvody. Trochu mě zarazila diskuze mezi Vámi a Darwinkem, tak jsme se na to podíval trochu blíž a nelíbí se mi, že skupinu organizují lidé, kteří mažou (nearchivují) nové příspěvky ze svých talk stránek (tohle není mířeno na Vás) a obesílají desítky uživatelů kvůli anketám. Ty ankety stejně nemají valný význam, obzvlášť když obešlete jenom ty, od kterých čekáte, že potvrdí Vaše stanovisko. Wikipedia je o hledání koncenzu, nikoli o přehlasování legitimních argumentů. Například u toho Matušky měla být situace IMO řešena zahrnutím obou jmen s tím, že pod jedním je znám v anglicky mluvících zemích a jiné je jeho původní české jméno. Víte, on pravděpodobně v USA používal jméno bez háčku (snad tohle lze nějak ověřit) a je pod tím jménem znám v anglicky mluvícím světě. To z této verze jména děla zcela legitimni použití, i bez ohledu na guidelines a názor jiných uživatelů. Článek může zůstat kde je a tohle může být snadno vysvětleno jednou větou.

Každopadně tohle je spíš naokraj a ve zkratce, co mě k tomu vedlo. Jste velmi horlivý, zejména pokud jste přesvědčen o svém stanovisku. To samozřejmě není nutně špatně, ale asi byste měl trošku ubrat plyn a nebrat spoustu věcí osobně. Vadí mi i to, že na anglické wikipedii píšete česky a diskutujete o projektu česky, ale to je asi jenom můj problém. Hodně štěstí.

(If you are interested in contents of this discussion, please ask for English translation on my talk page. Thank you.)--Pethr 16:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Needed citation

On the iBook page, I wrote that Apple still distributes iBook G4s. My reference, the fact that my school has provided every student (except 6th grade) with a brand-new laptop that is a iBook G4. There are two websites about this, maine.gov/mlti and mainelearns.org. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 169.244.116.66 (talk) 14:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC).

Wiki Project?

We would like to invite you to join WikiProject Czech Republic, a project dedicated to building and maintaining a large and neutral database of Czech Republic-related articles on Wikipedia. To join, simply add your name here.

I see you have made positive contribs to the Czech Republic ariticle. --Jimbo Herndan 17:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you :-)

Pethr, thank you so much, that was very kind of you - methinks that may be a hint to call it a day now and go to bed :-) Kind regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi, just to say thanks for the edits you did to the Clinton Administration page on the senior staff section. I tried reorganising it before, because originally it was just one hodge podged list but it looks 100% better now its organised with bullet points and double columned. Great work! LordHarris 13:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

The first foreign Hero of the Soviet Union

Hi Pethr! As for your opinion: who was the first foreign Hero of the Soviet Union? Tell me yeah? --Honzula 22:35, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

OK - "the first one in the Great Patriotic war" could be?--Honzula 23:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Image + Otakar Jaros

Image is obviously in the public domain, so source is not required. Also you are wrong, check this [6] The first foreign citizen to receive the highest Soviet distinction (posthumously) was Otakar Jarosh, an officer of a Czechoslovak Army unit stationed in the USSR. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 22:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Gibelli was an axis pilot shot down by Siergiey Luganski and Volkan Semyonovich Goranov became a Soviet citizen in 1920. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 22:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Otakar Jaroš (1.8.1912-8.3.1943) - vůbec první cizinec oceněný za války titulem Hrdina SSSR, titul udělen in memoriam 17. dubna 1943 za statečnost v bojích u Sokolova. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 22:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

OK, fixed + fair use for Otakar Jaros image added, FU is enough. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 23:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Public domain photo of Otakar Jaros is more than impossible to find :( He became famous mainly after his death, thus we cannot hope for a lot of pictures. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 23:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Probably you're right with that Italian, I did not find any source about him :( ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 23:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Just my two cents: Your source (Fronta.cz [7]) says that the medal Gold Star of the Hero of the Soviet Union was awarded from 1st August 1939, so the first two probably didn't get this (but they were Heroes of the Soviet Union). So Otakar Jaros may be the first foreigner to get the Gold Star. --Marvin ^talk 18:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

OK boys! I checked Goranov and Gibelli - (see this) Volkan Goranov was born in Bulgaria, in 20's he emigrated to USSR and joined Red Army, where he later served as the flying instructor, in 1936 was sent to Spanish civil war, in December 31, 1936 awarded Hero of USSR, later he became the Gold Star of HoSU No 22, training pilots in WW2, return to Bulgaria not until end WW2. Primo Gibelli was born in Italy, in 1921 he emigrated to USSR and joined Red Army (first as the infantryman, since 1923 as the pilot), in 1936 was sent to Spanish civil war, in November 14, 1936 was shot down and killed by fascist, awarded in memoriam. In the same website, Otakar Jaroš is considered to be "the first of foreign soldiers honoured by title Hero of the Soviet Union" and also "the first foreigner honoured by the highest award of USSR". This means, they were members of Red Army, when awarded - Jaroš was the first foreign army's member awarded.--Honzula 18:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Removing images from Spain page

You recently removed images from Spain page with the comment to the effect "that's what the commons are for." I'm afraid I don't understand your deletion or your comment! If you were moving the images to the commons, and re-installing them, I guess I could understand your plan. As it is, you lost me! Could you explain in a bit more detail why you removed these images? EspanaViva 08:04, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Aaron Sorkin article over at FAC

Pethr, thanks for taking the time to read and critique the Aaron Sorkin article. I responded to your comments on the FAC nomination page. I'm not sure if it addresses all your concerns, but let me know either way. Thanks.-BiancaOfHell 08:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Removal of warning at User talk:Arem04667

In your comments upon removing the warning from this page, you said "I can't see such edit and link to it is dead". I'm not even an Administrator, and I can show you enough... [8] And if you couldn't see the deleted page, what motivated you to remove someone elses warning? NipokNek 21:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: User talk:75.4.64.6

Ah, sorry, I was attempting to remove the obvious vandalism underneath "Headline text" visible in this revision: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pet&oldid=106362710

Either I removed the wrong section by mistake, or there was a collision with someone else attempting to do the same removal (?)

At any rate, sorry for the mistake; it was my first attempt at an edit. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.4.64.6 (talk) 05:11, 9 February 2007 (UTC).

Help with image tags

I have seen that you have marked Image:AZNAVOUR.JPG with a strange template claiming that the fair use rationale is not correct. I have found that image in here (and in many other sites when you search Aznavour in Google Images), and therefore it is not in public domain, it is not an "Own work" and its author is not "OettingerCroat". Could you help me by putting the correct templates? I am not an user of this wikipedia and I do not know their procedurals. --SMP - talk (en) - talk (ca) 09:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

What I wanted to say is that the claim of "own work" in that image is not correct since for example it appears in here.--SMP - talk (en) - talk (ca) 11:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Few Czechs on Waldemar Matuška consensus

Votes were: 4-Czech, 2-Poland, 2-Slovakia, 2-Japan, 1-Colombia, 1-Finnland, Consensus was reached do you want to repeat voting until you will achieve result that you like ? No, vote again, No, damned, vote again, No, damned vote again, No, damned vote again, Yes, stop voting, no other votes are allowed. That's ridiculous. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 11:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: vandalism

That user was blocked for personal attacks like "vyser si voko zmrde treba ted a tady", "LASKAVE NA TO NEMAKEJ! PODEPSAL JSEM SE AROGANTNI SPRATKU" and "bez do pici ty zmrde". (I also don't really understand how this edit summary was personal attack?) -> check the edit summary. Most of his edits were disruptive vandalism. I am tolerant to personal attacks in the hot discussion where blood is boiling, but not in the edit summaries and on the talk pages - that's offensive. He was blocked for that. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 05:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

You forgot to say:" I went to cant_sleep_clown_will_eat_me with my lousy translations a cry and cry, until clown blocked him" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.99.129.71 (talk) 04:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC).

Names of the Czech Republic and "Česko"

I saw you reverted the change to Czech Republic - you got there first. :-) Since you might be a better person to check, could you see if this edit by User:71.99.129.71 is also bad? When people change 'yes' to 'no' I always wonder... Shenme 05:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Military of Armenia

Hi, much of the info that I added to the Armenia page comes from the Military of Armenia article, which only has a few references. I'll try to find some later on. Thanks for your concern. -- Davo88 14:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

74.69.147.123 Vandalism

IP adress 74.69.147.123 has vandalised List of current United States Senators by seniority, this is after your warning that he will be blocked. How can I get the IP address blocked?--Dr who1975 18:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for reporting this and for showing me where to go in the future.--Dr who1975 19:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I don;t get why the IP wasnlt blocked... he just vandalised the page yesterday. Your last warning to him was on the 13th.--Dr who1975 20:12, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Georgia

I am sorry if I accidentally violated the policy, but I did not understand why you reverted in the first place. I was just researching something with User:Alexis and we resolved the problem. But next time I will discuss it on the talk page, if it is that emotional for some users. SosoMK 20:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

What are you doing? why are you reverting? SosoMK 20:29, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry for removing your edits, where you said that Georgia is a dictatorship and Georgian wine sucks. If you think that way, go take a hike. SosoMK 20:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi Pethr. I would concur with Sosomk in that the wine passage reflected only a Russian POV. If we are going to describe this issue in details in the section and describe the positions of all sides, the article will turn into the longest one in Wikipedia. I think the current version is OK. Thanks, --Kober^Talk 21:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I see no problem in moving the portal link to the bottom. Although I still think that the detailed description of the Russian embargo problem is redundant there, I have rephrased the passage for the sake of compromise. What do you think about the current version? Best, Kober^Talk 05:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Romeo Dallaie

EXCUSE ME- (to Pethr, Fred Rwigema has been dead since 1990, UNAMIR wasn't combatant less so on Hutu' side; which Peace treaty was a result? Please don't add unsourced nonsense) ) What do you mean unsourced?? I go the peace treaty from one of the Rwanda Genocide pages on Wiki, anybody knows that is what happened. I can give you about 100 sources. Please repsond. CF Captain Dell970 19:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Fred Rwigema in the wiki page said he died in 1994. CF Captain Dell970 23:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Making up books. What are you talking about?? Are you saying I didnt write a book??? CF Captain Dell970 00:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

United Kingdom

Hello Pethr, the edit I made to the article were meant to make it more concise. Due to the size of the UK article it seems appropriate to have detail information (including references) in the linked articles. Inwind 08:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi Inwind, well I understand your reasons now but it is very wrong. You can rewrite some paragraph in summary style if you want to make article shorter but you can never remove valid reference. A) It doesn't make article shorter - only source code is shorter and it isn't really an issue - references and oher sources should not be counted into article lenght because they are not part of main text and so they don't make the actual reading take longer time. And B) references are needed to reference the text. If you want to verify a statement you are not going to go through the entire Wikipedia to see if it is cited somewhere else. I hope I clarified it a bit. Thank you.--Pethr 17:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello Pethr, I do not agree with you that references can not be deleted. On WP:REF there are some rough guidelines on referencing. One statement I find useful to decide whether a references is required or not is: All material that is challenged or likely to be challenged needs a source. There should be very few people challenging the triangular trade and a justification is not prerequisite. If a Wikipedia article already exists it is the logical choice for detailed information. If you feel that important information about the UK has been lost, please let me know. Inwind 08:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

don't push the Czech names here so hard, it doesn't make any sense

We don't call Aachen as Cáchy in its article just because Charles IV ruled the city in 14th century. I will push Czech or English names in the articles about Czech cities but never Germans. Should we call Prag instead of Prague, Brünn instad of Brno? Germans names should be and are mentioned in the caption in the brackets. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 08:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

So we misspointed each other. Because I did not edit Zahrada Cech at all, in fact I did not touch that edit. I fully agree with Garden of Bohemia or Bohemian Garden or whatever. No problem with that.

What I thought you mean and with which I highly disagree is using Leitmeritz inside the article.

≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 14:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Remove it, I have no problem with that :) What do you think about Leitmeritz vs. Litomerice ? ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 15:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

It has nothing to do with the revisionism. Leitmeritz is mentioned in the caption, but the editor used Leitmeritz across the article. Pensioners chose Leitmeritz; had to leave Leitmeritz. It sounds bad for me. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 16:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Swedish Telecommunications=

Hello Pethr, on February 23 I edited the article on Sweden to include a brief overview of a very vast history of Sweden's Telecommunications industry. You removed it stating that it was too extensive. I moved the information to the article on Communications in Sweden but wanted to know why shouldn't this information be a part of the article. I felt it was appropriate since the article on Sweden covers so many aspects of the nation that I feel this part of its history shouldn't be left out or be a part of some other article. Any thoughts?

School computers, I guess sharing IP's. Somehow I got the message. Sorry for my ignorent classmates.

No guidelines

You know you pointed to WP:GTL and there's no mention of hiding TOC. Did you mean to direct me somewhere else? (→Netscott) 02:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Pointless? I have heard from numerous editors who've told me how great it was. Here one editor expresses, "The blank space was hideous, and I hadn't realized that there was any way to solve this." while here an editor expresses, "you will be fixing an accessibility problem, congratulations!". Admin User:NYC JD had this to say. Obvioiusly that template has support. (→Netscott) 02:41, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Do you realize that your logic actually works both ways? There is much to be said for esthetics and layout... obvioiusly an article with an extremely large amount of empty blank space does not look appealing. Casual visitors aren't dumb, TOChidden makes it plain to see what one needs to do to read the table of contents. (→Netscott) 02:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Well given the support I've already demonstrated to you a TfD would likely result in a "no consensus" keep just like for this other TOC. (→Netscott) 03:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Answer from user User:Bg007. As you see I didn't remove , i just made an article.Because you don't know serbian history,there is not enough space to describe every war. In past century we had 5 wars (1911,1912,1914,1941,1999). Then Let's describe all of them.

Please note

Hy Pethr!

Please, read the "Please check" part on this user's page User talk:Jpgordon first. Thank you:Pannonia 16:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Re:The Descent and every other movie

You may want to review Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines#Cast and crew information and Wikipedia:Spoiler. Cast sections are not mandatory, and Wikipedia is not a directory, that is what IMDb is for. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not censored. Tables are frowned upon unless there is a reason for them, like having a "List of" article, where a table would better organize the list. As of right now, there is nothing in that cast section that screams "this is encyclopedic". There is no casting informatin, not even character descriptions (which itself opens up the "original research" hole to some anonymous editors). If you are simply going to have a table that lists the exact same people mentioned in the plot, then it is redundant. As for "spoilers", it was decided that if it's obvious that there will be spoilers (i.e. A section titled "Plot") then you don't warn them. Wiki isn't censored, and so the warnings are really not mandatory anywhere, but are graciously allowed in sections that might reveal something (hence the reason why I put on in the "Insanity Theory" section, as it reveals things about the film).  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 18:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

HRC ref work

You're doing great work on the refs, but I disagree about pulling the AP out of cites ... I'll raise it on talk, but don't make more changes like that until discussed ... thanks again! Wasted Time R (talk) 02:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Uxbridge

Hi Pethr: I want to put this one to bed. I grew up in this town and caught the article on Wikipedia when the local mill fire made national news last year. It was a mess... no references, but interesting trivia. I learned about American History, local history, and how to be more helpful to the Wikipedia cause rather than to mess it up worse. No problem with your edit suggestion about bullets. Its done, not too much work. Probably not the best grammar and syntax, but I am no pro. The bullets helped me to organize what was important to retain from a a very long winded article which is now down from over 10 pages of text to around 6. Thanks. User talk:Ksherin 16:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:BangladeshCartoon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BangladeshCartoon.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --15:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Prod versus speedy

Hi, I've seen you use {{prod}} a couple of times when the article is patent nonsense and is thus eligible for speedy deletion. All three times you could have used {{db-person}} and the article would have been deleted a lot quicker. It's just that nonsense articles hanging around for longer cheapens the validity and quality of the encyclopedia. Nice work all the same. -- Roleplayer (talk) 11:13, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Popups

Might want to check your popups script - "(diff) (hist) . . Ghetto‎; 08:20 . . (-249) . . Pethr (talk | contribs) (Revert to revision $1 dated $2 by $3 using popups)". :) Orpheus (talk) 10:32, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

RE: WP:OR tag on EUFOR Tchad/RCA

Wrong tag i guess. Sould have been citations missing. "On 15 March 2009, a UN force took over under the MINURCAT mandate." is unsourced (and in the lead, where the article is better.) Also the contribs cites seems deficient with some countries having cites and others not. Otherwise its ostly good, though it needs more in th e article about its mandate and work instead of its cmposition.Lihaas (talk) 03:33, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Hillary Rodham Clinton move request

Greetings! A proposal has been made at Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton#Requested move 8 to change the title of the article, Hillary Rodham Clinton to Hillary Clinton. This notification is provided to you per Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification, because you have previously participated in a discussion on this subject. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Masaryk University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athlete (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Masarykova univerzita.tif on Commons

Hello, in my opinion, the linked logo of Masaryk University clearly qualifies as PD-textlogo, particularly if you consider the other images currently in the respective category. Therefore, I have put the PD-textlogo template back. If you have another opinion, please start a discussion on the image's talk page. Leaving the image without copyright template has not done any good, because then other person came and marked it for deletion as if it had lacked any copyright information at all since the beginning. --Blahma (talk) 17:44, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mu logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mu logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:35, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Hillary Rodham Clinton - Move Discussion

Hi,

This is a notification to let you know that there is a requested move discussion ongoing at Talk:Hillary_Rodham_Clinton/April_2015_move_request#Requested_move. You are receiving this notification because you have previously participated in some capacity in naming discussions related to the article in question.

Thanks. And have a nice day. NickCT (talk) 18:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)