Talk:Red Army

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleRed Army was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 13, 2006WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
May 22, 2007Good article nomineeListed
April 3, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 23, 2005, and February 23, 2006.
Current status: Delisted good article

Origins of Polish-Russian War[edit]

It may be a good idea to start gathering sources on this important but little known conflict so we can describe it better. Right now the subject is one sided and does not even factor the movements of Polish forces into Ukraine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Centurion216 (talkcontribs) 14:56, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Emphasis on Red Army's contribution to European theatre of World War II in lede[edit]

The lede seems to place a lot of emphasis on the Red Army's contribution to the European theatre of World War II, but as this page shows they were involved in numerous conflicts from their inception until their eventual dissolution. I feel like such information would be more appropriate in the section that specifically pertains to the European theatre of World War II, instead of in the lede. Tjohns35 (talk) 01:55, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unofficial Red Army Flag[edit]

The article states that a flag with a yellow star on a red background was the unofficial flag, but when checking the source its actually stating that it was a myth with no basis. This implies that it never was an unofficial flag in any sense, and it makes me feel like the article should not include it since it has no historical usage according to the source. 75.235.201.216 (talk) 04:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]