User talk:Azwaldo

AbdomeN

Hi Azwaldo, it might seem strange but AbdomeN is absolutely not a candidate for deletion. The reason it exists is because the page used to be at that title a long time ago when Wikipedia used the UseMod software and all titles had to be CamelCase. This meant that single word titles had to use strange capitalization. It is quite possible that external site linked to this old title, or that people bookmarked it and never updated their links. Therefore, if we delete, we risk breaking links. It's not a huge risk, but then keeping the redirect isn't a huge hassle either, so on balance, the policy says to keep it because the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of doing this. See Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion and Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy/redirects if you want more details. Angela. 22:01, Jan 4, 2004 (UTC)

E. Coli

A redirect from Fecal coliform bacteria to E. coli sounds a good idea. Be bold! Angela. 00:56, Jan 5, 2004 (UTC)

Taxobox

Hello and welcome! Generally taxoboxes should avoid sub and super categories because that complicates the table and since sub and super categories are not used as often as the regular KPCOFGS ones. But higher level taxa have fewer items in the classification part of the table so, IMO, it is not as important to exclude sub/super there. So if a sub/super category is important enough to the taxon you are writing on (this is often the case for birds and plants), then listing them in the taxobox may make sense. Above all else use your best judgment and don't forget to have fun! :) --mav 10:29, 15 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Wasp

Hi,

Concerning the Wasp page: first of all, sorry for answering late (I dont look at my user page that often); second: I quite like the opening paragraph, I think the page might as well stay that way. Tjunier 11:47, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC)

File:Whirligigbeetle.PNG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Whirligigbeetle.PNG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

No author is cited by the source; I have added a note to the file and expanded the description. azwaldo (talk)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Azwaldo! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, "Significant publications" in biographical article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to .

Your thread has been archived

Hi Azwaldo! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Why is "Cultivation theory" evaluated as a biology topic?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to .

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultivation theory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Cohen. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)