Talk:Johann Wilhelm von Archenholz

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Military history: Historiography

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military historiography task force

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is affected by the Gdańsk (Danzig) Vote. The following rules apply in the case of disputes:

For Gdańsk, use the name Danzig between 1308 and 1945
For Gdańsk, use the name Gdańsk before 1308 and after 1945
In biographies of clearly German persons, the name should be used in the form Danzig (Gdańsk) and later Danzig exclusively
In biographies of clearly Polish persons, the name should be used in the form Gdańsk (Danzig) and later Gdańsk exclusively.
For Gdansk and other locations that share a history between Germany and Poland, the first reference of one name in an article should also include a reference to other names, e.g. Danzig (now Gdańsk, Poland) or Gdańsk (Danzig). An English language reference that primarily uses this name should be provided on the talk page if a dispute arises.
Reverts to conform with community consensus are excluded from the three-revert rule (3RR). Only the place names can be reverted exempt from the 3RR according to the outcome of this vote, additional changes fall again under the 3RR. Please use descriptive edit summaries.
Persistent reverts against community consensus despite multiple warnings may be dealt with according to the rules in Wikipedia:Dealing with vandalism. In case of doubt, assume good faith and do not bite newcomers.

The detailed vote results and the vote itself can be found on Talk:Gdansk/Vote. This vote has ended; please do not vote anymore. Comments and discussions can be added to Talk:Gdansk/Vote/discussion anytime. This template {{Gdansk-Vote-Notice}} can be added on the talk page of affected articles if necessary.

"Now Wrzeszcz" and "now Gdańsk"[edit]

I don't understand your reverts of my edits, Chris. I am following the Gdańsk Vote decisions. I use double naming. For persons of clearly German ethnicity I put the German name first. But you have to agree that inserting word "now" before the Polish names (which are older than the German ones) you're misleading the public into thinking that those cities have been recently renamed (like Königsberg). Also, I don't think there is anything wrong in mentioning the country of birth. Without it a layman would think that a German person was naturally born in Germany. I'm just making it clearer. Please respond. Space Cadet 11:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First: I am fine with either (Now Gdansk) or (Gdansk), similar for other locations. Secondly, he was Prussian, not polish. He wrote only in German. I added a bunch of English language references that state he was Prussian/German. I did not find a single reference that stated he was Polish. In that respect calling him a native of Poland is just wrong. -- Chris 73 | Talk 21:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also added his list of publication, based on the German article. Looks like your Pole did not write anything in Polish, or bother to publish anything in Poland -- Chris 73 | Talk 21:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I never called him a Pole so don't put words in my mouth and save your sarcasm. I don't know that it's wrong to say that he was a native of Poland, but we can always say that he was born there, or is it also wrong?

It seems Poland is still suffering from a shortage of historical figures and thus in need of "importing" some?-- Matthead ^discuß! O 00:29, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again I never said, implied or suggested that the guy was in any way Polish, so how am I trying to "import" him? His parents "imported" him by deciding to have a baby in Poland. But thanks to the Potsdam agreement hopefully no more famous Germans will be born in Poland anymore. On the other hand if you guys feel so uncomfortable (and perhaps threatened?) by mentioning the guy's country of birth, let's leave it out. If you can't change the history, you can always hide those parts of it that are inconvenient for your POV. In the same spirit why don't we change Royal Prussia from "Polish province" to "a province", Ducal Prussia to "a fief"? All I want is peace and mutual respect. Space Cadet 11:26, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Book link[edit]

I don't read the language so can't insert this link myself, but this book is freely available and should be linked herein. Parrot of Doom 11:17, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]