Talk:Book of Genesis
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Book of Genesis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Book of Genesis was nominated as a Philosophy and religion good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 26, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Book of Genesis:
|
Most mainstream Bible scholars??[edit]
Who are these MOST Mainstream Bible Scholars please? Who and how did someone calculated this please? Do we have sources and citation please? By doing so, are we recommending people about what to believe and what not? Also, Why can't we say what's Christian's belief of the book of Genesis? - Common... it's a Christian Book and not Mainstream Scholars Book! Praveen.arokyaswamy (talk) 03:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- POV-pushing for your own religion (which does not seem to be mainstream Christianity, but fundamentalist Christianity) is very much not appreciated as a matter of website policy, see WP:RNPOV.
- Yup, many Christians don't know there is such a thing as liberal Christianity, but if forced to choose camps, most Christians in the world would choose its camp.
- You can fool yourself that I'm the Big Bad Wolf who ruins everything Christian at Wikipedia, or you can accept an explanation which is more compliant with Occam's razor, namely that the powers of WP:BESTSOURCES are opposing you. In fact, everybody should know that at Wikipedia editors who merely push their own POV are very easy to defeat. Editors who simply push a POV get contained, at a certain point they will rebel against containment measures, so they will misbehave, and they will get blocked and then banned. tgeorgescu (talk) 04:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- "Why can't we say what's Christian's belief of the book of Genesis" Because Christians are not a reliable source with a reputation for fact-checking. They are instead known for their belief in hoaxes. Dimadick (talk) 08:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- "it's a Christian Book" Wow, your anti-semitism is evident. This is a book about Jewish mythology, likely written by Jews. Dimadick (talk) 08:45, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Question[edit]
I don't think that the article needs the "Title" chapter, as the first paragraph already tells the reader to etmyology of Genesis. Feel free to tell me otherwise. Firesword9140 (talk) 01:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Revert[edit]
I have reverted an edit which is thoroughly WP:FRINGE, i.e. pseudohistory. tgeorgescu (talk) 13:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's totally fine. Thanks for keeping up with these edits and reverting when necessary. Hist9600 (talk) 14:24, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Another IP, possibly the same person, had added the same information yesterday, and I had to correct it. It seems someone may be actively watching the page to insert these dates. Ltwin (talk) 16:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, both geolocate to Adelaide, Australia. tgeorgescu (talk) 16:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Dead Sea study and date of composition[edit]
I just noticed and removed the following from the Composition section:
By comparing Dead Sea level indications in chapter 14 of Genesis Amos Frumkin and Yoel Elitzur suggest the composition dating between 1500 and 1200 BC.[1]
After checking the article out, I believe this is a misreading of the article. The study authors were attempting to use biblical evidence to determine historical fluctuations in the Dead Sea levels. I don't think they are making definitive statements about when biblical books were actually composed. I could be wrong, however, so I'm leaving this here for other editors to evaluate. Ltwin (talk) 21:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Amos Frumkin; Yoel Elitzur (May 2002). "Historic Dead Sea Level Fluctuations Calibrated with Geological and Archaeological Evidence". Quaternary Research. 57 (3): 336. Bibcode:2002QuRes..57..334F. doi:10.1006/qres.2002.2330. S2CID 129375298.
Wiki Education assignment: Criticism as Praxis[edit]
This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 February 2024 and 24 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Keegancroteau12 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Keegancroteau12 (talk) 04:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- B-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- B-Class Religion articles
- High-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- B-Class Christianity articles
- Top-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- B-Class Bible articles
- Top-importance Bible articles
- WikiProject Bible articles
- B-Class Judaism articles
- High-importance Judaism articles
- B-Class Ancient Near East articles
- Top-importance Ancient Near East articles
- Ancient Near East articles by assessment
- B-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists