User talk:216.153.214.94/archive3

• User talk:216.153.214.94/archive1
• User_talk:216.153.214.94/archive2

All entries prior to 03.25.05 have been archived (see above).

216.153.214.94 02:44, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

You have been blocked again for reverting the deletion of the "actual form" paragraph in Killian documents four times in 24 hours (23:08, 13:11, 14:54, and 22:47). The block is for 48 hours since this is your second offense in the same article. Please discuss your differences with other editors on the talk page instead of starting a revert war. Gamaliel 03:14, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Notice of another Request for Arbitration

In light of your multiple offenses since returning from your four-month partial block, I am beginning another arbitration proceeding; see Wikipedia:Requests for Arbitration. JamesMLane 05:21, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

ArbCom case

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rex071404 3 is now open. Please add evidence at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rex071404 3/Evidence. --mav 02:12, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

killian documents, please stop the disruption

Please don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point, if you have concerns about the article there is a talk page available. The sentence in question is cited later down in the article and neutrally presented, so what is your problem with it exactly? The caveat sentence you added, after much unnecessary reverting, looks ok for now. zen master T 20:12, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

So the caveat sentence you added half a day ago apparently didn't make you happy enough to stop being disruptive? Your caveat sentence was actually fine, it balanced everything out but now you want to move that out of the intro section entirely, why? What changed between then and now? A member of congress alleged what that sentence describes, it goes to the core of the issue, it balances the POV of there even being a controversy i.e. if people know it as "Rathergate" they potentially only know one side of the issue. zen master T 06:25, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)