Talk:Douglas Y1B-7

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Titling the page[edit]

I decided to make the title of this page Douglas Y1B-7 as opposed to Douglas B-7, because the USAF Museum website says that the planes never entered production. But in the Boston (disambiguation) article, it says that the Douglas B-7 was called the B-7 Boston in service of the RAF. Until more information can be dug up, I don't think links showing B-7 should be changed (yet).--Ingoolemo 22:07, 2004 Aug 1 (UTC)

NOTE: The Douglas "B-7 Boston" is actually what was originally known as the DB-7, which was also known as the A-20 "Havoc". (A.Andrus, 16-JAN-06)

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Douglas Y1B-7/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

About as complete as an aircraft this old will be; includes all standard pieces of an aircraft article. Karl Dickman ^talk 03:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 03:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 13:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Douglas Y1B-7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090302160505/http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil:80/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2442 to http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2442

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]