Talk:Electric current
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 360 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Exceptionally well written[edit]
I wanted to thank an editor who made all these beautiful referencess by using {{rp}} and {{r}} templates. Well done mate! Keep it up. As a side note I would propose to add coulomb per second formula for immediate clarity: C/1s = 1A/s. Best. AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 17:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Exceptionality of physics formulas[edit]
I could only think that some physics and electricty formulas does have exceptionality in being "well written", either in November (whatever that means actually in Eisenstein nuclear science for civilian use), but I cennot get what is $ per second formula for immediate clarity?, a reductionism of Einsteinian formula and time-space calculations? --195.24.52.66 (talk) 10:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC) Alex on formulas
Categories:
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class physics articles
- Top-importance physics articles
- C-Class physics articles of Top-importance
- C-Class electrical engineering articles
- High-importance electrical engineering articles
- Electrical engineering articles