Talk:Florida panhandle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

How did they define the Pandhandle so precisely (down to the specific counties)? Is there some geographic separator, like a river? Or a cultural, demographic divide? Because some of the eastern counties of the Panhandle look very much in the Peninsula (from a pure visual perspective). --Menchi 05:32, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I wouldn't call any of the eastern counties the Panhandle at all. I'd redraw the map boundaries. Mike H 09:44, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)

The map[edit]

[[Image: hi people!

I'm removing the map after the edit I made. I asked for the map to be redone, as the easternmost eight counties are definitely not the Panhandle. The eastmost county in the map is where Live Oak is, and I can tell you that's much more northeastern Florida, and that isn't even the northeast Florida BOUNDARY. Likewise, Gilchrist County is much more tied to Gainesville, which is decidedly not the Panhandle. Mike H 09:57, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)

  • When I lived up there - the Panhandle - was defined as those counties west of the Chattahoochee/Apalachicola River. Whoever put Jefferson county in there must be smoking some of that good ole Panhandle weed.--Hokeman 04:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • The map is excellent. All the critics need to go out and enjoy the weather. I am removing the citation needed comment. What citation is needed? All one need do is look at the names on a map for the counties on the space on the map, and thus discover for themselves. Dogru144 (talk) 14:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The current map is just awful; the drawing is poor and I don't even think it's accurate. We really need to form a consensus on a new one. This issue has been under discussion since 2005. I almost just put the map at the right on the page until I read Hokeman's comment. So, has anyone got any ideas on what we can do here? Danny (talk) 03:28, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the name[edit]

so why is it called panhandle then? -- .~. 84.133.110.62 (talk) 21:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Compare it with a map of Oklahoma and with some kitchenware, maroon!

I think this is a good question. It is not immediately obvious why it is called a panhandle. I for one used to think that this phrase referred to the peninsula. (Elephant53 (talk) 13:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I've often wondered that. The map of Florida looks nothing like a Cooking pan (or any other type of pan that I know of), and the "Panhandle" doesn't look like a handle for such a pan either. The best that can be said it that is a geographic term (Panhandle)), not a look-alike thing. Terry Thorgaard (talk) 18:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think most people looking at Florida would think the southern part of the state would be called the pan handle, with the part which is actually called that would be more like the pan. And I think the first person to respond to the question and called the OP a 'maroon' (without identifying themself) is the 'maroon'.UnderEducatedGeezer (talk) 03:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2000 presidential election[edit]

One problem showing up then was that at least some networks announced that polls were closed in Florida (forgetting that the far west was in Central Time Zone, causing polls to open and close 1 hour later there). It probably looked odd to some people that Florida, in addition to having an Atlantic coast, has part of the state in Central Time Zone. (The Eastern/Central boundary runs along the Georgia/Alabama border, then cuts thru Florida on its way to Gulf of Mexico.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 (talk) 15:27, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Climate[edit]

A new section on the climate in the Florida Panhandle would be very interesting. Especially a comparison to the rest of Florida. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.97.109.134 (talk) 18:04, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology[edit]

If anyone from the fucking panhandle knows what that means :p the question above was a good one; the name should have a section describing origins etc, for those of us lucky enough not to live there. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:54, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Florida Panhandle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Florida Panhandle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 December 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Supporters generally cite the MOS:CAPS guideline. In contrast, those opposing cite consistency with similar articles, but generally do not object to moving similar articles to lowercase as well, which would maintain consistency. I therefore put more weight to the supporting arguments. (closed by non-admin page mover) feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 06:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Florida Panhandle → Florida panhandle – Not consistently capped in sources per WP:NCCAPS and MOS:CAPS. Cinderella157 (talk) 03:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). – robertsky (talk) 02:26, 22 December 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:13, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose move: "Florida Panhandle" is capitalized by both the New York Times and Washington Post, as well as by local/regional newspapers such as the Tallahassee Democrat and Pensacola News Journal. It also matches the capitalization of our Oklahoma Panhandle article as well as *all* of the other panhandles at Panhandle (disambiguation). I'm not sure what sources go into the near-50% non-capitalization shown in your graph, but the most reliable secondary sources in 2023 are all clearly capitalizing "Panhandle". PK-WIKI (talk) 00:37, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[T]he most reliable secondary sources in 2023 are all clearly capitalizing "Panhandle". It is only opinion (not substantiated) that the newsorg sources being cited are the most reliable secondary sources in 2023. The Tallahassee Democrat and Pensacola News Journal are not reasonably independent of the topic as they are headquartered in the region and it is not consistently capped in this or this NYT article. Also, it is not capitalised by the Wall Street Journal here. Ngrams draw on a much much broader sample set of published works than four newsorg sources. While regions described as "panhandles" at Panhandle (disambiguation) all capitalise "panhandle", an ngram review of these would indicate that six should use lowercase, while two give no ngram result out of the eleven articles - indicating that other articles also need to be reviewed. "Other stuff" arguments are double-edged. We should not be consistently incorrect. However, WP:CONSISTENT and Wikipedia:TITLECON deal with naming patterns and topic-specific conventions on article titles. They do not touch on capitalisation. This is dealt with separately ate WP:AT (see WP:LOWERCASE). Cinderella157 (talk) 04:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I find it perplexing to say the sources are not independent because they happen to be headquartered in the same region. That's assuming all the writers are from the area which I highly doubt. The New York Times and Washington Post are generally reliable sources. Names for regions are usually interchangeable with capitalization as it comes down to the context. – The Grid (talk) 15:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Grid, per WP:SSF, writers closely associated with a subject are prone to over-capitalisation for emphasis or distinction (see MOS:SIGNIFCAPS - we don't do that). Hence, why I would exclude the two local news sources. I would agree that the WP and NYT are generally reliable. If one reads my response above, one would see that neither is consistent in their capitalisation of Florida panhandle. While these sources are not definative, their inconsistent capitalisation indicates that (per MOS:CAPS) capitalisation is not necessary and therefore we should not be capitalising the terms. Names for regions are usually interchangeable with capitalization as it comes down to the context is a curios statement (without substantiation). If Florida panhandle only reasonably refers to the subject region, what other context is there? Proper noun|names are capitalise with near universal consistency regardless of context. Florida panhandle is not (per ngram). This tells us that capitalisation is not necessary and that we should not capitalise the term per MOS:CAPS. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per discussion and common and descriptive name. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Randy Kryn, descriptive names are common names (ie not proper names) and therefore they are not normally capitalised except perhaps for distinction - but we don't do that either per MOS:SIGNIFCAPS. Cinderella157 (talk) 00:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You know what I mean by descriptive, the panhandle shape is what gives the area its name. The name seems to be a proper name, that's what that section of Florida is named, and related uppercased names are presented by The Grid in the comment below. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:54, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I would imagine the usage for the lowercase is perhaps the same as the uppercase. There's the applied name with Panhandle as the demographics and also the applied geographical name where a lowercase is sufficient. You could argue panhandle is a valid alternative but the region names are never in sentence case. (e.g., Big Bend, Emerald Coast, Space Coast, Treasure Coast, First Coast, Forgotten Coast, Gold Coast, etc) – The Grid (talk) 20:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support lowercase – clearly not close to "consistently capitalized" in sources, so per MOS:CAPS and WP:NCCAPS, we use lowercase. Dicklyon (talk) 01:46, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Exceptions are allowed. Looking at the n-grams for this page and the articles listed below, uppercasing and lowercasing are close but, importantly, uppercasing comes out ahead in all cases. Especially if looked at throughout the decades, all have more uppercasing than lowercasing, which rides reasoning and exception quality into commonsense territory. Doesn't seem to be any ngrams for Connecticut Panhandle but sources and maps seem to say its a "thing". Randy Kryn (talk) 05:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Randy Kryn, I know that you have participated in enough capitalisation discussions for you to know that MOS:CAPS states: only words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in Wikipedia and that this is a high threshold - much, much more than the slightly ahead for this article indicated by the ngram. Cinderella157 (talk) 10:33, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are clear exceptions to that guideline, including this one per comments above and below. When all the uses of 'Panhandle' in article titles which can be n-grammed show up with ngrams favoring uppercase (especially looking at past usage) then the exception-improves-the-rule. Randy Kryn (talk) 16:35, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose a lone move of this as it would not be consistent with other states (Connecticut Panhandle, Idaho Panhandle, Nebraska Panhandle, Texas Panhandle, Northern Panhandle of West Virginia, and Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia). Would support a renomination of all of these for a broader discussion. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Elli: - just to be clear, I imagine a nomination or move of those other panhandles will quickly follow this RM, so I don't think we need to be concerned about consistency here. Do you have an objection to this move in principle, other than the consistency issue? If not, I think we should just go ahead, it would be IMHO unproductive to start all over again just for the sake of including those other cases. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 16:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Amakuru not really. I do think that such an RM might fail, and then we'd need to revisit this one, hence my preference for closing this and then making a new nomination with them all bundled (so the issue can be decided together). Elli (talk | contribs) 16:22, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Elli and the comment I made above showing examples of other regions in Florida. Additionally, I am a bit confused on what Cinderella157 is trying to state. I thought Ngram was a guideline. – The Grid (talk) 17:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC) Abstaining my vote. – The Grid (talk) 14:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    ??? You are very confused, either about guidelines or n-grams or both. Dicklyon (talk) 17:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support—This is a no-brainer. A huge majority of reliable sources need to cap it for us to consider doing that. See MOS:CAPS. Tony (talk) 21:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - absolutely slam dunk, given the usage in reliable sources. The above opposition has no basis in policy or guidelines whatsoever, so should be largely disregarded. The moving of other panhandles can quickly follow this one too, so consistency isn't really a valid reason to hold this up. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 16:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Dubious Politics Section[edit]

The phrase "The western panhandle, particularly the Emerald Coast, was one of the earliest areas to shake off its Yellow Dog Democrat roots," is dubious. While Taft won Calhoun in 1908 and parts of Florida panhandle voted for Herbert Hoover in his 1928 victory, these were aberrations. The panhandle voted Democratic from 1932 to 1960. By contrast, the other parts of Florida, were being regularly won by Republicans at the presidential level as early as 1948. Republican members of the Florida legislature elected during the time when Florida was a de facto one party state include Henry C. Hood (1917) of Palm Beach County, Albert R. Welsh (1929) of Pinellas County, R. Everette Burchard (1933) of Hendry County, J. Frank Houghton (1953) of Pinellas County. A review of The People of Lawmaking in Florida 1822-2019 demonstrates this. In 1960, it remained solidly Democratic, while other parts of the state voted for George C. Petersen and in 1964 when other parts of the state voted for Charles R. Holley, it stuck with Burns. This section generally and this sentence specifically are dubious. Mpen320 (talk) 15:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Florida_panhandle&oldid=1213861969"