Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Sandall

William Sandall was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

William Sandall

Vanity article of a 12 year old. Cute, but not encyclopedic. Thue | talk 16:42, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• I think that can be speedied for obvious vanity, but let's try to get the user to sign up so we can move it to his user page first. If that isn't happening soon. Delete. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 17:02, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete but I think he is highly notable :) Wyss 18:12, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep for a while. He's created Incendary bombs now merged, and added to Erraid. Although he did vandalise Potassium nitrate I'm prepared to give him the benfit of the doubt and asssume it was a mistake. Someone should post (I'll do it) on the discussion page that he should create a user page - let's hope he comes back! Martin TB 18:30, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. --Randy 19:54, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: Vanity. "He sits writing his autobiography for Wikipedia" means that he knows that he's writing autobiography. Geogre 21:28, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Wait for him to register, if he doesn't then delete. I am wagering this is Wikipedia's youngest contributor? Ashibaka tlk 02:51, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • No, we've got a 7-year-old. (Oh, and delete)DS 02:45, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Move to a holding location so that he can recover it for his user page if/when he creates a login. [[User:GeorgeStepanek|GeorgeStepanek\^talk ]] 00:58, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Comcat

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.