Talk:Jurisdiction in rem

Untitled[edit]

This might better be moved to the List of Latin phrases and this page replaced with a #redirect.— Preceding unsigned comment added by BenFrantzDale (talk • contribs) 05:37, 3 February 2005 (UTC)

I disagree. If it's going to be merged with anything it should be moved to a larger article about jurisdiction rather than the too-general list of Latin phrases. But I think it's fine where it is, too. Kat Walsh (spill your mind?) 20:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree as well. It seems fine where it is. Butnotthehippo 02:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This entry seems rather lacking though and could use some development. I could be wrong on this, but I have never heard of marital status being ruled on via in rem jurisdiction... Butnotthehippo 02:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The current last paragraph sounds like conspiracy theory gobbledegook. Would the author care to produce a source for his claims? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.29.206.196 (talk • contribs) 23:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]