Template talk:Ultima

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Minor changes[edit]

I did some minor changes to this template. Pretty much italics stuff, but I also fixed a problem that happened when using that template on the Ultima article, regarding its header. Seems fine now. – Kaonashi 02:28, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Formatting[edit]

As it is, the template kinda gets in the way of some of the page formatting -- check out Ultima Underworld and you'll see what I mean. I suggest the tempate be moved to a bottom-centre format like that most typically used in game sries, as with Template:SimUniverse and Template:Civilization --Alexwcovington (talk) 11:05, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've reshaped the box to landscape. Not sure how to go about centering it.--DooMDrat 12:34, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ultima novels[edit]

Navboxes really shouldn't contain external links.. -- œ 07:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, probably so. Can't make an article for any of the books, since someone would come along and delete it. That's how it is these days. I Google for the first two, but don't find any reviews for them anywhere. Anyone think there is enough coverage of any of the books for there to be an article on the Ultima novels, combined together? Lynn Abbey wrote two and someone else made three more I think. Dream Focus 01:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I notice there's already mention in Ultima (series)#Novels.. should be enough. -- œ 11:42, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Underworld Ascendant[edit]

Although Underworld Ascendant is a continuation of the Ultima Underworld series, it is NOT an Ultima game as they did not get the Ultima license (this is even mention on the primary article, here's the reference.) As such, I think we should put it in parentheses since this infobox is for Ultima.S-1-5-7 (talk) 14:37, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]