Talk:Wax gourd

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

confused two different melons??[edit]

Yes, winter melon and maoqua are different, even though it is very difficult to tell by their external physical features. However, it is easy to tell the difference by their seeds. I have uploaded images of their seeds: mao_qua.jpg and winter melon seed.jpg. Please take a look. For unknown reasons, people in Souhtern China prefer to consume mao_qua when they are approximately 15 cm long but winter melons are normaly consumed when they are about 80 cm long and about 25 cm in diameter. Farmers normally allow more than one mao_qua to grow on each plant, while only one winter melon is allowed to grow on one plant such that it will have chance to grow to its "expected" (above mentioned) size.WingkeeLEE 11:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

冬瓜 and 毛瓜 are two different plants. donggua have large leaves and they are raised on the ground. maogua are raised as vines on scaffolds hanging down. I have eaten both for several decades and I can tell you they are not the same. Perhaps some pictures will clarify what you are talking about. Kowloonese 23:34, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)

I am not a botanist, so I don't know how the classification is done. From the external link, we can clearly see that there are more than two varieties, Benincasa hispida (Thunb.) Cogn. ()a.k.a Winter Melon in English) and Benincasa hispida (Thunb.) Cogn. var. chiehqua How (a.k.a NOT winter melon in English). If two varieties are classified, then it is not true that the "chiehqua How" variety is simply a baby stage of the other variety. If this article is titled Benincasa hispida, then both can fit here. However, this article is titled Winter melon which means the "chiehqua How" does not belong here. Kowloonese 00:04, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)

I'm very sorry; I meant for the external link to accompany my reply to your comment, not for it to be my reply, but there was some problem with my network after I put it in and before I could respond here.

I was in the middle of writing to clarify what we are talking about as per your request: Here's a page that shows both, more or less according to my understanding (scroll down for number 3 and number 4): [1]. Here's another page that has a better picture of 毛瓜: [2]. (I'm assuming we can take 毛瓜 and 節瓜 as synonyms.)

I'm going to save now, in case I have more network problems. I will continue writing.

— Pekinensis 00:19, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The sentence "The fruits are fuzzy when young, before the waxy coating has developed, giving rise to the name Fuzzy melon." came from WormRunner. This is actually exactly how I understood the situation before today, but we could ask for a reference.

We have the same understanding of the external link, so I believe that the "chiehqua" variety is usually eaten immature and hairy, while the other varieties are usually eaten mature and waxy. The former is called 毛瓜 or 節瓜, while the latter is called 冬瓜.

However, the "chiehqua" variety can be eaten mature, in which case it may or may not be waxy. Is that called 毛瓜 because of the variety or 冬瓜 because of the age? I have not found a reference, but I will bet my pants that the other varieties can also be eaten immature, although I'm no longer sure if they would be hairy, and I'm no longer sure what they would be called. What I'm saying is it's not clear to me whether in these two cases the age or the variety would take priority (although if pressed I would guess the age).

On the other hand, all of these questions may be separate from the question of whether there should be more than one Wikipedia article. It would be possible to have separate articles for different growth stages, or one article that covers more than one subspecies. I think this question should be driven more by content, and since for the moment I have run out of things to say about any kind of 瓜, I don't have much opinion on splitting the article or not.

It would be less work if we didn't split the article.

— Pekinensis 01:06, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I have grown winter melons (no mean feat in Oregon) and they are fuzzy when young. I note here that "hispida" means hairy. I have not personally grown the varieties which are harvested as young melons, but my understanding is that the situation is very similar to zucchini versus pumpkin, i.e. two varieties of the same species selected to be at their best at different life stages. As for splitting the article, I could see it either way, as long as the two were appropriately linked. What would be lovely is if someone intimately familiar with this species and its varieties could rewrite the article and add detail. -- WormRunner | Talk 00:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I don't know if this relates to the 冬瓜 versus 毛瓜 debate, but I see that Zepheus proposed merging this article with casaba, but casaba is a cultivar of Cucumis melo, which is a wholly separate species, though it too has a cultivar known as "winter melon". (I'm removing the merge template) ENeville 07:05, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have extended the article of 節瓜 in Chinese version wikipedia. Stewart~惡龍 09:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

I removed this article from Category:Melons (see Category talk:Melons) and from Category:Fruit because it is already in the subcategory Category:Vegetable-like fruits. — Pekinensis 13:44, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Wrong link[edit]

I believe this link is wrong, as it is to an entirely different species. Badagnani 04:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why called "winter melon"?[edit]

Why is it called "winter melon" in Chinese? Is it eaten primarily during the winter (and, thus, equivalent to the English term winter squash)? Badagnani (talk) 04:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

毛瓜[edit]

Need to add mention of the name 毛瓜 to the article. Badagnani (talk) 04:13, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

repeated line under uses[edit]

The line "Winter melon is also a common name for members of the Inodorus cultivar group of the muskmelon (Cucumis melo L), more commonly known as casaba or honeydew melons." from the introduction was repeated in the Uses section. I took it out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yingkaixing (talk • contribs) 22:51, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DAYS TO MATURITY[edit]

All of these plant articles, throughout Wiki, need to include the Days-to-Maturity in the Cultivation section, as basic growing information on the plant, which is a key distinguishing factor between even related species. Starhistory22 (talk) 18:22, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taste[edit]

About half of this article is about *uses*, which are almost exclusively ways of preparation for eating; yet there is not a word about what this thing (fruit? vegetable?) TASTES like, beyond this largely unhelpful aside at the very bottom of the section: "a fruit drink with a distinctive taste" . Oh, how informative. Has no one writing about this plant here ever tasted one? Or would such a description be disallowed because it wasn't cribbed from some previous external work, and instead damned to banishment as the dreaded "own work"? I suggest some brave soul should own up and provide a report, somewhere in the article, about what inspires people to bother to eat this thing.2001:56A:F0E9:9B00:2162:F5D9:D10D:DA6C (talk) 06:02, 2 August 2022 (UTC)JustSomeWikiReader[reply]