Talk:Dosage (album)

from VfD:

I don't feel that this notable enough to warrant its own page. It should perhaps be deleted and the contents merged into a page dedicated to the band. TigerShark 20:49, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Keep. Article can, should be and will be expanded. I think it is notable enough, as Collective Soul is a fairly famous band. More than 133,000 google hits, most of which appear to be about this album. (for those interested, Wikipedia is the 28th hit)Tuf-Kat 22:20, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
Keep I'm not one who thinks absolutely every recording known to man needs its own article, but this is a fairly major one by a fairly major artist. A better title would be Dosage (album) though IMO. Starblind 22:49, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
- I would agree with the move if there was something at Dosage about the general idea. I'm certain it is encyclopedic and there could be an article there, but there isn't one now. Tuf-Kat 23:06, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
Keep Also same with Blender (album). They aren't orphaned pages, but linking to the main bands page via the nav box. Agreed they could have more information about the album, but it is stubbed after all. Also, move page to new title like suggested above. Inter 23:02, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep. We have a lot of albums by groups less notable than this. Rick K 23:05, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. I agree with the previous entries, although I do note that I am biased given that I did start the article, and I agree with the move to Dosage (album) as well. PlasticBeat 23:11, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
A major-label, full-length, original release by an internationally famous rock group. Keep. Samaritan 00:39, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep -- DCEdwards1966 00:58, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
Move to Dosage (album) for the reasons specified above. --Death phoenix 03:17, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Weak Delete, borderline notability. I'm not convinced that this needs its own article. Megan1967 03:55, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep. I hope to add more info after weekend. Notable album by notable band. Support move to Dosage (album). Capitalistroadster 10:24, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep and rename to Dosage (album). -Sean Curtin 22:08, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)

end moved discussion

Fair use rationale for Image:Collectivesouldosage.jpg[edit]

Image:Collectivesouldosage.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Collectivesouldosage.jpg[edit]

Image:Collectivesouldosage.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dosage (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]