Talk:Priapulida

Animals Mid‑importance

Priapulida is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Marine life Top‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Marine life, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on marine life. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marine life To do:

Have a look at the Marine life WikiProject and sign up.

Here are some tasks you can do, as organized by The Marine life Wikiproject:

Collaboration of the week: Marine life article assessment
Other: See the projects page
Images: Upload any non-copyrighted marine life images to Wikimedia Commons
Featured Articles/Good Articles:
Other: Add {{Portal|Marine life}} to related articles

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Number of Species[edit]

How many species are known in this phylum? --Savant13 14:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are 16 species known --Skaldic 17:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Penis Worm[edit]

the PENIS worm! gotta love it.

Name is redundant, no?--Wasabe3543 16:18, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Why is it called the penis worm? Does it inhabit penises? Does it resemble a penis? Is it noted for it's penis? Monsday 06:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Resembles a human penis. User:CarlFink

I guess students name their penis worms "Dick" in the labs....204.52.215.107 01:51, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this was vandalism...guess not.D-rew (talk) 14:53, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Number of Genera[edit]

This article says "There are three genera...", but the Classification section shows many genera. Which is correct? --121.112.124.72 (talk) 12:44, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Propably refers to class level taxons: Priapulimorpha, Halicryptomorpha and Seticoronaria. --92.118.191.48 (talk) 02:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

name[edit]

It's named after the appearance. I just thought scientists would be more ...eh.... scientific than to say, "It looks like a penis! Let's call it a penis!"--Loodog (talk) 21:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Priapos was a mythological personality characterized by his permanent erection. Priapulida would translate to "dimunitive permanently erected man" or even worse "very small dick"... --92.118.191.48 (talk) 02:04, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to broken DOI[edit]

A reference was recently added to this article using the Cite DOI template. The citation bot tried to expand the citation, but could not access the specified DOI. Please check that the DOI doi:10.1130/G30829.1 has been correctly entered. If the DOI is correct, it is possible that it has not yet been entered into the CrossRef database. Please complete the reference by hand here. The script that left this message was unable to track down the user who added the citation; it may be prudent to alert them to this message. Thanks, Citation bot 2 (talk) 14:12, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]