Talk:Uruguay Round

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have basically made this page completely by myself. Hope you like it, whoever reads this!

Typo[edit]

What's "righ" supposed to be in this sentence:

One aspect of this criticism is that figures very close to righ country industries — such as former Cargill executive Dan Amstutz — had a major role in the drafting of Uruguay Round language on agriculture and other matters.

Right? High? What is it? - DNewhall 20:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citations[edit]

This really needs citations. I would like to see where it is Oxfam International has criticized the round. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Agentgreen004 (talkcontribs) 06:02, 10 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

So who signed it ?[edit]

Generally in treaties there is a list of people present and how they voted. I've heard that the U.S. didn't sign it and that it does not apply for the U.S., but this is just hearsay for me - don't put it in because I don't know. Please add more details - this is the World Government we're talking about here! 4.154.248.231 (talk) 02:12, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"put restrictions on foreign investment"[edit]

I'm not an expert, but wasn't the goal to prohibit measures (taken by countries' goverments) that restrict foreign investment rather than to put restrictions on foreign investment? So basically the opposite from what is written in the article? --81.242.6.98 (talk) 17:22, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Impact of the round[edit]

What was the impact - not the eutopian wishes of economists, but the actual impact? So far I cannot find any articles nor info written in the last 2-3 years, only hopes from before implementation. The closest I find is this: http://www.voxeu.org/epubs/cepr-dps/settling-tradegrowth-dispute-impact-uruguay-round maybe an expert can say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.244.80.133 (talk) 09:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]