Talk:Kosovo-Pomoravlje District

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Kosovo

	Kosovo-Pomoravlje District is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Serbia Mid‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Note: All official material made by Government of Serbia is public by law. Information was taken from official website.

This is a NATO Sector[edit]

Pomoravlje District is A NATO Sector i Kosovo The District in Kosovo since 1960 are Gjakova/Djakovica, Gjilan/Gnilan, Ferizaji/Urosvac, Mitrovica/ Kosovska Mitrovica, Prishtina/Pristina, Prizreni/Prizren, Peja/Pec This Districts are acceptit rom UNMIK--Hipi Zhdripi 19:14, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

What you mean since 1960? Before 1999 this district existed and such (and other 4 too). I do not know when they were formed, but they are at least part of the history of Kosovo, if not part of the present. PANONIAN (talk) 02:15, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Prishtinas Parliament has maket this dstricst in year 1960 Gjakova/Djakovica, Gjilan/Gnilan, Ferizaji/Urosvac, Mitrovica/ Kosovska Mitrovica, Prishtina/Pristina, Prizreni/Prizren, Peja/Pec. After Milosevic destroid the Parliament of Pristina, he have maket this districts. Befor that he have trait to do that but that was not cceptyt from Prishtinas Parliament. The only legetime Parliament for the districts in Kosovo it was the Prishtinas Parliament. See the Federal Constitucion of Yougoslavia (The SFR of Yugoslavia it was maed from 6 Republic and 2 Provinces and after year 1974 the Provices have the same presentation in Federation) The Prishtinas Parliament it was Autonom to administret the teritory of Kosovo. I dont know wat you have lerned in Belgrad Way is there AUTONOMY. Sorry, but the facts are this: the Kosovo Parliament was there and they war presentit in Federal level not only in the SR of Serbia. This it was a dual-system . Ech element of the RS of Serbia it was presentit in the Federation and this three element make together a bount callit RS of Serbia. Milosevic has destroit this bount and he (the Parliament in Belgrad) have taket legetmation from two Parliaments (in Novi Sad they have destroid themself in Prishtina they ave callet the Republik of Kosovo this is the day wich is cosideretit the day of justic war betwen the Parliament in Belgrad and Prishtina: argument the civil Law in Kosovo after the UN cammes is the Law one day befor the Milosevic destroit the Parliament in Prishtina). if you dident anderstet till now Im wery, wery sorry but the War with arms its over, and the justice ware is in Wien betwen this two parliaments.--Hipi Zhdripi 03:20, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you are traing to make the historical selection then you most write it is historical.--Hipi Zhdripi 03:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC) I dont think that we need a articel about this. --Hipi Zhdripi 03:42, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All right, I wrote that it is historical. PANONIAN (talk) 08:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delet[edit]

This articel must be deledet or mergerd in one articel called Districts of Kosovo durin Milosevic time.--Hipi Zhdripi 03:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We should not delete this, but keep it as an historical article. We can also write one new article named Districts in Kosovo 1990-1999 where we can mention these 5 districts, but we should also keep these 5 articles and put them into "History of Kosovo" and "Serbian history" categories, since they in fact do not exist any more after 1999. PANONIAN (talk) 08:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Naming[edit]

Anamorava is the Albanian name of the region, and of District_of_Gnjilane. And most of article links are also on Serbian, and it is hard to find this article when looking for it from the albanian names. We need to merge these articles into one. I propose that we merge them.

new infobox[edit]

I think we need a new infobox for the districts of kosovo/serbia that contains information about kosovo, and not just serbia. That would make it more neutral.

Neutrality problem[edit]

Why does this article reflect the "point of view" that the province is still controlled by Belgrade? Shouldn't our articles reflect reality, instead? bobrayner (talk) 00:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are two views presented in this article. One view is that this district existed "between 1990 and 1999". Another view is view of Serbian government that this district still exists. The second view is mentioned in part of one sentence and carefully attributed to the Serbian government.
Why did you misrepresented the situation regarding this article?
Why did you edit war to add incorrect information this district was part of country which did not even exist in period between 1990 and 1999? --Antidiskriminator (talk) 07:03, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make up your mind?

Either this is a historical article, in which case we use verbs like "was", and it describes the situation when Kosovo was controlled by Serbia. Or it's a current-day article, in which case we use verbs like "is", and we describe the situation after Kosovo declared independence. It is not possible for us to have articles based on some fictional parallel universe in which the Serb flag still flies over Kosovo. bobrayner (talk) 20:04, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will you please be so kind to reply to my questions and to present the sentence which contains "is" instead of "was"?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:18, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, Antid, we will fix Serbian constitution to reflect users POV. Everything will be ok then. This is outstanding, i really dont know what to do... Log off would be the best for me now. --WhiteWriter^speaks 20:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]