User talk:68.80.223.233

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I am who I am, I wish to remain anonomous for the moment.--68.80.223.233 14:26, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Welcome!! You just the page Navy Department. However, the redirect was wrong. I fixed it, but in future redirects should be typed like this:

#REDIRECT [[page name]]

I know this is not how they look, but this is the only way they'll work. Thanks,--Honeycake


To say that the Cyprus debate is utter nonsense is a lie and a farce to the progress of international politics. Turkey claiming ownership to part of Cyprus is basically the equivalent of the EU saying "Here, Germany, you illegally conquered these countries, you can have them back, we don't care." Modern warfare has always seen the return of occupied lands, whether by allied force or by treaty/dissolution of a larger state (see USSR). Turkey continues to be able to ignore modern results for their actions...no penalties for the now-recognized genocide of Armenians, no return of Cypriot land, no admonishment for attacking Kurds who only seek their lands returned. These are just a few of the reasons by Turkey is not admitted to the EU, in addition to their horrific economy. Surely you've researched better than that. -- NJDevils1087 —Preceding comment was added at 14:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Akhand Bharat for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akhand Bharat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhand Bharat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:50, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fowj. Since you had some involvement with the Fowj redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:09, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]