User talk:Fountaindyke~enwiki

Welcome[edit]

Hello Fountaindyke~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions: your considered thoughts on the talk pages of Anne Frank and George W. Bush. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Gareth Hughes 02:09, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Pete Townshend[edit]

Thanks for your thoughtful contribution on this matter. I'm sorry your thoughts were shot down rather harshly. I have been laboring on this issue for the past few weeks - and it has regrettably become rather contentious. It certainly helps when others contribute and bring light rather than heat.

I had been focused on one key issue - whether it was fair for Wikipedia to brand Townshend as a "Child Sex Offender" or even just "Sex Offender" in his cateory section (without any modifying note) - when he was neither prosecuted nor convicted. Something that I think would be impossible where due process is required. And that issue is still being weighed by people on Wikipedia. I have asked a lawyer friend of mine to look at the various legal assertions - and provide a concise response that makes it clear for laypersons.

But you raised an equally important point that perhaps should be explored further. It's a thought that had not occurred to me. You have questioned the overall weight and extent of the topic on the Townshend article in relation to his achievements and impact. You seem to feel that it is disproportionate. It's a very interesting point. As currently presented it does seem to overwhelm the page. In ways that the legal problems and personal scandals of artists such as Chuck Berry, Willie Nelson and Jerry Lee Lewis do not overwhelm THEIR articles.

I believe that the event must be noted in the article. It should not be swept under the carpet as though it never happened. On the other hand - it IS a very complex matter to explain. And therefore takes up space. Perhaps the topic would be dealt with better as a sub-page - linked to from the main Townshend article? A brief notation that there was an incident that excited media attention for 5 months in 2003. A succinct summary. And a link to a page where the chapter and verse can be laid out (if people feel it necessary). I don't know the Wikipedia guidelines on that. What do you think? Davidpatrick 15:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Fountaindyke. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Fountaindyke~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

12:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)