Talk:April 2005 Cairo terrorist attacks

-- There is an ongoing fight whether these attacks should be labeled terror or not, we should observe Political Correctness here. --

"Minor" is inherently NPOV[edit]

I changed "three minor terrorist incidents" into "three terrorist incidents". Let the reader judge whether the incidents are to be considered minor or not. --Edcolins 07:15, May 3, 2005 (UTC)

Well, when someone says terrorist attacks, I automatically think of 9/11, Embassy bombings, and the like. This is just some guy with a homemade bomb who brought along his girlfriend and his sister. Maybe the reader should make up his mind on his own, or maybe it's our job to put things into perspective.

In any event, not a particularly impressive terrorist cell, at least not the Saturday incidents. Opening fire on a bus and not killing anyone? (I'm still unsure about the "3 injured" claim there -- some reports seem to indicate that's the two shooters plus one, and no report I've seen has identified any bystanders who were shot.) And jumping off a bridge with a bomb and not killing anyone? That's a very busy bus station: bomb or no bomb, the probabilities seem to say he should have killed one or two just by landing on them. But that's only the later incidents: it'd be disrespectful to refer to the Khan al-Khalili attack as "minor". –Hajor 20:05, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on April 2005 Cairo terrorist attacks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]