User talk:Bleedy

Hello, "Bleedy" and welcome to Wikipedia. A few tips for you:

• Peruse Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers and associated pages, such as
  • Wikipedia:How to edit a page
  • Wikipedia:How to write a great article
  • Wikipedia:Naming conventions
  • Wikipedia:Manual of Style
• You can experiment in the Wikipedia:Sandbox.
• Sign talk page entries with ~~~~, which is automatically converted to a name and date.
• If you have any questions, see Wikipedia:Help, or you can a question at the Wikipedia:Help desk.
• I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian.

-- Infrogmation 14:22, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Please stop making false statements

You have never met Keith Wigdor. Please stop.24.168.66.27 17:50, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Please behave

Please see Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:No personal attacks, Wikipedia:Wikiquette, and try to write with those guidelines in mind. Thanks, -- Infrogmation 21:51, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Short block

Due to many reverts and edit war over the Keith Wigdor article, I have put a short term block on both you and User:24.168.66.27. When the block expires I hope you will edit responsibly according to Wikipedia standards and attempt to disucss any problems with articles on the article talk page rather than getting into a multiple revert war. Thank you. -- Infrogmation 07:40, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Temporary block, take 2

I have just put a 48 hour block on both User:Bleedy and User:24.168.66.27, in response to Bleedy's personal attacks and 24.168.66.27's deleting discussion from talk pages. Both users have repeatedly been warned to follow Wikipedia guidelines and Wikipedia:Civility and have previously been blocked for edit/revert wars. -- Infrogmation 18:17, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

'Ultimatum'...

Not sure I quite follow. I thought you were content with the 'self-characterising' wording. Anon user 24.etc's noises on the Talk: page about "ask Keith nicely for some surrealism" were pretty annoying and self-serving, oops, I mean, Keith-serving, but surely they're not directly relevant to the article per se. (Some third-party criticism certainly would be, though.) Alai 15:30, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Questionable, indeed?

OK, I'll bite, exactly what do you consider 'questionable' about me? Alai 05:03, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Ok, Bleedy, I see your point over the issue of notability

Bleedy, I see your point over the issue of notability. Though I do not agree with you, I do fully support the same rights that you have as I and everyone on here. I would never deny your rights, as I hope that you would not deny mine. I am going to apply the same rule of examination for Votes for Deletion on articles that do fall under the category for VfD, (after following your concerns), we all must move on. I am going to be starting VfD on articles as well. Any input by you would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Bleedy, a question

Even Wigdor gave a public statement requesting Wikipedia to delete the article on him created by Infrogmation, so why did you go to all the trouble over this, "surrealist movement" and "surrealists" that you were talking so much about? Bleedy, is Dale Houstman a surrealist? I did see an article on him here and I need to know if you think he is notable? Bleedy, what happened to all of Andre Breton's lifetime collection of surrealist art and found objects, rare books, etc. from that auction? Do you know?Classicjupiter2 01:56, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Bleedy, another question

Bleedy, do you think that an article on Leeds(Bill's gang) Surrealists is required, or will lack of information on them necessitate an article deletion?Classicjupiter2 01:09, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Surrealism in 2005

Did you mean a, "Surrealism in 2005" article to be created here on Wikipedia?Classicjupiter2 15:35, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

An answer to your question

I am not Keith. Please stop calling me Keith. As for your question about, "Trash from around the world" posters, well, Bleedy ol' buddy, I could recommend that you stop on by Enrico's Cafe. While you are there chillin' out with the crusty elitist leftovers from the 60's, take a listen to this great surrealist band, The Low Priests, http://www.thelowpriests.org They are real good and that surrealist X is a hoot! Well, Bleedy ol' buddy got to run, say hello to all your friends over at Enrico's Cafe and say hi to Philip too! ooooppssss! Please forgive me, Bleedy! I forgot that he was dead. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!Classicjupiter2 00:08, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Any automatics lately?Classicjupiter2 14:39, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hey Bleedy! How's the food over at Enrico's?Classicjupiter2 23:53, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The surrealist Keith Wigdor requested to have the article deleted, that is old news. What I do see is that your little friends are trying to worm their way on Wikipedia by getting articles for themselves. No problem, they ALL been deleted, even your book. Oh, were you friends with Philip Lamantia?HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!! I think his life was recently deleted! HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The Low Priests Rule!Classicjupiter2 23:13, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Bleedy, were you friends with Philip Lamantia? Was the new Pope a fan of his writing? Are the rumours true about Lamantia? Is Philip Lamantia really a surrealist? Will there be an action figure created in memory of him? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!Classicjupiter2 17:17, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Hey, Bleedy, was Ronnie Burke and Philip Lamantia lovers? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Classicjupiter2 17:17, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

By the way, Bleedy ol' buddy, while I am here, I wanted to ask you if you have any frottage artworks from the sores left on Ronnie Burke's body? HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! Pat Christen rules!Classicjupiter2 17:17, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Bleedy, ol' buddy, you didn't answer the question! Any frottage artworks from Ronnie Burke's sores? HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Classicjupiter2 19:50, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Block

As User:Classicjupiter2 has insisted I take action against the snarky comments and insults you've left on his talk page, I've given you a short term block. As I have no interest in taking sides and the above makes it clear Classicjupiter2's behavior is no better, I have temporarily blocked him as well. Have a nice Wikivaction, and if you decide to come back, please behave better. I do think that whoever decides to take the high road rather than the low would in time be the winner in the Wikipedia community, but I have no expectation that you will take this advice. -- Infrogmation 20:18, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

So, does your presence here on Wikipedia have any other purpose whatsoever than to leave messages on Classicjupiter2's talk page? Wikipedia is not a forum for personal chat. Wondering simply, -- Infrogmation 22:12, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I agree with Infrogmation. Please stay off my talk page and stop the badgering and harrassment. Please.Classicjupiter2 20:54, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

Warning

As Classicjupiter2 has made it clear that they do not wish you to keep adding those comments to their talk page, and as this account has made no other contributions to Wikipedia for months, I can only conclude that your actions are some type of trolling or deliberate annoyance of another user. Knock it off or you'll be reblocked. -- Infrogmation 13:55, 4 August 2005 (UTC)