Talk:Shoeburyness

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article needs a map.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Shoeburyness was copied or moved into North Shoebury on 9 March 2024. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Untitled[edit]

Hi morwen- I live in Southend and have done all my life (well since I was six) and wasn't aware it was a 'city' (no cathedral here from where i'm sitting :-) ), so unsure how Shoebury can be within 'city boundaries' (at the arse end of southend might be a better description, though somewhat POV ;-) )- can you be more specific?? quercus robur 19:10, 15 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Is Shoebury Common Beach really known as 'West Beach'? When I was growing up in Southend in the 50s/60s/70s it was always known as South Beach or simply as Shoebury Beach (as opposed to Shoebury East Beach) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.194.86.1 (talk) 10:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where is "Shoeburyness Artillery", please??[edit]

Hopiakuta 06:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lacks detail[edit]

I feel this article lacks detail and could easily be elaborated upon. Shoburyness is steeped in history, particularly the garrison which, prior to it's re-development into a residential sector, housed the military for over a century [1]. I would add more myself only... I'm a lazy sod. --80.42.117.75 (talk) 00:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BUT KITE SURFERS ARE PENALIZED AS THEY ARE NO LONGER ALLOWED ACCESS TO THE PARKING AT THE ONLY ALLOCATED LAUNCH SITE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.34.179.149 (talk) 10:30, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shoeburyness. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071001002338/http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10023713&c_id=10001043 to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10023713&c_id=10001043

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:45, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

North Shoebury & Pig's Bay combined[edit]

I have now redirected the two pages into this page. Pig's Bay is technically only an area of Shoebury and even though it appears on the map, it really is not a geographical feature but a name given to the area by the military. I have moved the page into the Shoeburyness article and added references as most of the article was not referenced. North Shoebury is non distinctive since the 1980s, and since 1933 has been registered under Shoeburyness. The original page only quoted a statement from 1872, whose reference was dead, while the statement about distinctive area was just opinion and not referenced. Also technically, Southend Council only have two wards for the area, Shoeburyness and West Shoebury. The pages have been redirected to Shoeburyness, and I have updated the whole page to reflect Shoeburyness history as previously requested in this talk page, though I have only added a condensed history as there is so much more thst could be added, in fact a whole article on its own (Philip Benton/Judith Williams have written two historys of the town and the development by the Frapping family).Davidstewartharvey (talk) 06:50, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Last recorded case of indigenous malaria in the British Isles?[edit]

"Reported cases continued until 1921. Writing afterwards, malaria specialist Percy Shute reported that there had been 481 indigenous cases between 1917 and 1921, all of the Plasmodium vivax form.5 The last known indigenous case of malaria occurred as late as 1957."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7098523 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelhurwicz (talk • contribs) 19:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]