Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D.H. Records

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 20:09, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

D.H. Records

This "independent record label" appears to record only the label's owner, who does not seem to be notable. Delete. Jonathunder 04:40, 2005 Jun 3 (UTC)

• Delete non notable, possible self promotion. JamesBurns 09:33, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Both for non-notable and self-promotion. 216.158.31.195 17:08, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn/vanity/self-promotion. And pro wrestling and gospel music seems like an odd pairing, but that's just me. --Etacar11 17:28, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • My dear Etacar, you forget the Ultimate Warrior - who fights in the ring to the glory of his ultra-neo-conservative lord! 216.158.31.195 18:15, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Ahh. I don't get out much... ;) --Etacar11 18:39, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • It happens ;) Guess it doesn't say much about me that the only reason I know about him is thanks to SomethingAwful/ 216.158.31.195 18:50, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Label is small and plans to sign other artists. --Goofy14 01:16, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • User's only edit. --Etacar11 22:53, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Correction, my first and this is my second edit. Also, I looked at the article's history of edits. It's funny, Jonathunder did several edits for a few months, before submitting a VFD. --Goofy14 01:36, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.