Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Hi, I'm New Here"

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 21:46, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

"Hi, I'm New Here"

• Delete no encyclopedic value. --Randolph 19:40, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I'd say weak delete or merge or redirect. Feydey 20:04, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not encyclopedic Dsmdgold 20:15, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
• MERGE should probably be placed into the Internet Trolling article Cheese Grits 20:22, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Though it is true that newbies place those words on a forum, I just do not think it should be an article of its own. Admittedly, I didn't read the article before posting this opinion... Zscout370 21:22, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Our coverage of internet trolling phenomena is already pretty comprehensive. Slac speak up! 00:27, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unencyclopedic. Dave the Red (talk) 00:31, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Everything anybody ever said while trolling the net doesn't deserve a place in the trolling article. RickK 00:45, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not encyclopaedic, trivial. Megan1967 10:40, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, this really serves no purpose here Zechenia 10:38, 13 Apr 2005
• Speedy delete, newbiecruft. ComCat 06:42, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to welcome page. --Spinboy 19:20, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, seems like simply a silly article written for amusement -Husnock 04:10, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.