Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vested

Vested was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP AND MOVE to vesting. 4 votes to keep, 3 votes to delete. Postdlf 22:30, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Vested[edit]

Delete for dicdef. --Neschek 23:00, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Dictdef. Nadavspi 00:36, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete: Inaccurate dictdef (or, rather, a restricted and specialized one). Geogre 01:33, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep, move to Vesting and expand. The practice of vesting is significant, I think, and can have more content than a dicdef. As far as I can tell, it's not covered elsewhere on Wikipedia. If I'm wrong, comment on my user page and I'll change my vote. --Improv 17:42, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep/Move under Improv's assumptions that this is not covered elsewhere. —siro χ o 22:48, Oct 21, 2004 (UTC)
Move to vesting and expand. Agree with Improv, this is an important subject. - Taxman 22:57, Oct 21, 2004 (UTC)
Move to vesting and expand. — Gwalla | Talk 23:01, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.