Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big bullies

Big bullies

Big bullies was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete .

To me, this definition is just nonsensical. Deb 17:38, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Barely even a real definition, no hope of ever being expanded to an encyclopedia entry. Delete. Katefan0 17:54, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, unremarkable definition of a word combination. Wyss 18:45, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Nonsense. [[User:David Johnson|David Johnson [T|C]]] 21:06, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Not only is this a mere dicdef but I can find no evidence that the phrase is in active use in the manner described in this definition. Delete. Rossami (talk) 22:14, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Dictdef. -- Antaeus Feldspar 23:23, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: Nonsense. Who are these "people" who use the term for villains in fiction? I hope they're never in my class. Geogre 05:03, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. This phenomenon is already covered much more extensively at villain and antagonist, and the current article is unlikely to ever yield anything more than a dicdef. Furthermore, "big bullies" is a more general term than the article implies, being applied to pretty much any aggressive force perceived as negative, fictional or otherwise. [[User:Livajo|Ливай | ☺]] 08:10, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete --fvw* 19:50, 2004 Dec 16 (UTC)
• Deletetotally useless nonsense Carole a 18:34, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Nonsense. Jayjg 00:02, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.