Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Graves

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus, kept. -- Scott e^iπ 00:50, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)

Don Graves[edit]

Nonnotable politician who apparently is a candidate to be a candidate. Google doesn't show up anything relevant. Linuxbeak | Desk 15:25, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

Keep, appears to be a major-party candidate for national office. Kappa 15:53, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure. Is he "Donald E. Graves", the historian? Or a different Don Graves? — RJH
Keep. This is not the historian. [1] R Calvete 00:24, 2005 May 22 (UTC)
Delete: candidates for beginning to run are not significant for that reason. Give us some accomplishments, some policies, some things that make this person interesting and likely to be researched. Geogre 03:27, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless it is expanded to show notability. Vegaswikian 06:27, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Articles like this should be written when the person already is something notable, not when they appear to potentially be that. Otherwise there'll simply be too many useless placeholders. Hardwick 07:43, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No explanation of notability, no references in the article. Quale 03:03, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --MarSch 14:11, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course. Delete nominator ;-) -- Earl Andrew - talk 17:56, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Request expansion of the article to enable in forming an opinion about keep or delete.--Bhadani 13:02, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.