Wikipedia talk:Stability

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style

Manual of Style

	This redirect falls within the scope of the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, a collaborative effort focused on enhancing clarity, consistency, and cohesiveness across the Manual of Style (MoS) guidelines by addressing inconsistencies, refining language, and integrating guidance effectively.Manual of StyleWikipedia:WikiProject Manual of StyleTemplate:WikiProject Manual of StyleManual of Style articles
	This redirect falls under the contentious topics procedure and is given additional attention, as it closely associated to the English Wikipedia Manual of Style, and the article titles policy. Both areas are known to be subjects of debate. Contributors are urged to review the awareness criteria carefully and exercise caution when editing.
	For information on Wikipedia's approach to the establishment of new policies and guidelines, refer to WP:PROPOSAL. Additionally, guidance on how to contribute to the development and revision of Wikipedia policies of Wikipedia's policy and guideline documents is available, offering valuable insights and recommendations.

This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 27 April 2017. The result of the discussion was retarget.

Rule[edit]

Sometimes I want to propose a rule that, when someone goes on a POV crusade, they should be told not to edit any more until they can "state the other side's case to the satisfaction of the other side" (to paraphrase famous success coach Steven Covey). --Uncle Ed 20:58, 13 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Not a redirect[edit]

This shouldn't be a redirect. It's talking about how an article about a controversial topic can stop being reverted and inserted back and forth in an endless edit war. Please don't delete it. --Uncle Ed (talk) 12:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]