Talk:Circumpolar star

Definition[edit]

Technically, I've also seen definitions that indicate that the star does NOT need to be visible to the observer to be circumpolar. Could somebody fix or clarify this? It is unusual for a scientific term to not match its latin origin.

(Circum=Around/Ring & Polar=the Poles) (There are no Apparens/Visibilis/Observare/or other latin roots to indicate visibility)

The stars that are circumpolar at one latitude still continue to circle the poles even if they are continuously below the horizon at a different latitude. They do not rise and fall like the non-circumpolar stars which do not circle the pole, they are merely hidden to the observer. If circumpolar does not apply to them, they seem to have no word that does apply.

Suicircumpolar or Visicircumpolar would indicate a point of view.

Alternatively, circumpolar would represent visibility only if a world like exocircumpolar, extracircumpolar, or hypocircumpolar existed to indicate outside the viewed circle.

Regardless, to be a useful article, it should clarify proper usage by referring to related terms that are NOT circumpolar. --- "Such stars neither rise nor set, but hover just above the horizon." -- from which point on Earth? Wouldn't Polaris be almost overhead when one is standing at the north pole? -- Tarquin

yes, it needs some clarification i guess... I g2g and Im not sure how to word it. Lir 17:07 Oct 30, 2002 (UTC)

When I was north of the Arctic circle I glanced in the usual spot for the Big Dipper (Ursa Major) and was astonished find it missing, or as it turned out, to see how high it was. And then I craned my neck further to find Polaris. I suddenly felt like I was on a round planet and grasped celestial navigation in a way that no amount of semi-diligent study had ever given me. Ortolan88

Animation[edit]

Could you be so kind to correct the informations of the animation on the commons please? My English is not the best. mjchael

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Circumpolar star. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:11, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Circumpolar star. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120212074531/http://adwheelerphotography.com/2012/01/03/shoot-star-trails-the-easy-way/ to http://adwheelerphotography.com/2012/01/03/shoot-star-trails-the-easy-way/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

Merge Circumpolar constellation into Circumpolar star I see no reason why the article Circumpolar constellation needs to exist separately from this one; it describes the exact same concept and is a very short article anyway with little content that isn't already mentioned here. 86.144.233.215 (talk) 23:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and since the Circumpolar star article is more fully developed than the Circumpolar constellation article, the constellation article should be merged into the star article. Obviously a redirect should be made for circumstellar constellation after merging.PopePompus (talk) 04:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 21:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Polaris[edit]

Polaris is a circumpolar star that does NOT always have an azimuth of zero, as it does not sit exactly on the polar axis. alex (talk) 09:22, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]