Talk:British Rail Class D3/7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Naming convention[edit]

There is a discussion about the naming convention to use for articles about British locomotive and multiple unit classes at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (British railway locomotive and multiple unit classes). Your comments are more than welcome. Thryduulf 22:23, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Possible change to the title of this article[edit]

This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Rail Class D3/7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:06, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British Rail Class D3/7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:54, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Link for source on current existence checking[edit]

Hey I was looking back on my sources for the reddit post that someone else hastily copy-pasted into the original statement that the Class still exists and was wondering if my primary source, https://scalaenne.wordpress.com/2012/01/21/unaltra-locomotiva-di-guerra-la-ne-700/, as well as the wealth of photographic evidence that the locomotive claimed to be 7106 within it is still active, is up to scratch for being officially cited as a source. Tythatguy1312 (talk) 09:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That looks more like a blog than a reliable source… Danners430 (talk) 10:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will be perfectly honest and admit I'm at a loss here. Whilst there's plenty of photographic evidence that both 7103 and 7106 survive, the only online evidence I can find is a few scattered blogs, at least 2 photography websites, a reddit post that I personally wrote and, strangely, this article's Italian equivalent. You can rest assured that I didn't write the blogs in question as I was 9 in 2012 and also don't speak Italian.
Figured I should at least link the sources I mentioned though.
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locomotiva_FS_Ne_700
https://www.hrohrer.ch/railways/htm/ne700.htm
https://www.ilportaledeitreni.it/2021/09/14/312490/
https://www.reddit.com/r/TrainPorn/comments/tc6shl/the_d37_lives_as_2_preserved_examples_have_been/
For obvious reasons I don't intend to cite these as official sources, especially not the Reddit post. Tythatguy1312 (talk) 15:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]