Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Specialisms of medicine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Category:Specialisms of medicine listed for deletion on January 20, 2005. Consensus was to rename to Category:Medical specialties. RedWolf 06:16, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC)


Rename to Category:Medical specialties. Neutralitytalk 04:46, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)

  • This is the term they use in the articles. Probably for a reason. Medical-occupation persons must decide. Object until their opinion is heard. Mikkalai 16:26, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • I was neutral about this issue believing "he/she who came first got the naming convention" and that this was a British English naming convention. I'm in favor of Medical Specialties from a point of disambiguation. Perhaps a point to Specialisms? No I feel rather strongly in favor of Medical Specialties. DrGnu 03:00, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • what the hell is a specialism?? I strongly support the proposed change! thanks guys! Erich 04:25, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Vote:YES for renaming. I agree with the above. "Specialisms of..." just sounds awkward. Also my dictionary (American English) says that specialism is "devotion or restriction to a particular pursuit, branch of study, etc." so using that definition, the word is used inappropriately. I'm unsure if the meaning is different in British English. I agree with renaming to Medical specialties, which also keeps it in parallel with the other categories named "Medical ___" Brim 00:29, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
  • I looked it up, and it turns out specialism and specialty are synonymous. Specialty is much more common on Google (especially in the phrase "medical specialty"). However, specialism sounds very odd indeed to American ears, whereas apparently specialty is comprehensible in British English (see [1]). I tend to prefer specialty for that reason. -Aranel ("Sarah") 03:46, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Rename. Clearly, Medical specialties is the proper term. Specialism of ... sounds like a bad translation from French. Ekem 02:59, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)