Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Atlee Hodgson

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 03:22, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Robert Atlee Hodgson[edit]

Possible vanity page, not NPOV. Google produces one hit, to same content at http://www.explore-dictionary.com/dictionary/R/Robert_Atlee_Hodgson.html. Dave.Dunford 07:47, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

- The link is actually a mirror of the Wikipedia article, i.e. Google search finds nothing about this guy. Delete. SteveW | Talk 12:45, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't really appear to have achieved anything that exceptional, influential or significant. Showing promise but not achieving doesn't warrant an encyclopedia article. Average Earthman 09:01, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 11:51, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
D apparent vanity by a nn Fawcett5 16:19, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Vanity and non-notable --Neigel von Teighen 16:21, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.