Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wtfpwnsauce

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:31, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wtfpwnsauce[edit]

Stupid neologism. One google hit. —Ben Brockert (42) UE News 01:34, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

Delete. --W(t) 02:18, 2005 May 28 (UTC)
Delete and I think I'll add it to BJAODN. -CunningLinguist 03:30, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: More nausea from the fervid teen imagination. Geogre 03:31, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not article material Gblaz 03:46, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Vanity. WTFpwned!? is already listed as a variant at Pwn#Leetspeak. DoubleBlue (Talk) 03:54, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article lacks noteworthiness and relevance. Tobycat 05:13, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and flog those responsible. — Phil Welch 05:33, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:34, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. See also barbecue? gkhan 11:19, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Pavel Vozenilek 00:56, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'd pay a lot of money for a device that would allow me to punch people who use this word without leaving the comfort of my own chair. -Tadanisakari 07:43, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, neologism --Silas Snider (talk) 03:43, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.