Talk:Matthew 4

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Jesus work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Religious texts (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles

Bible Top‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled][edit]

Shouldnt the first reference to the Temptation of Christ by Satan be linked to the "The Last Temptation of Christ"? freestylefrappe 04:04, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

No they are very different things. The Last Temptation is a fictional addition to the Biblical temptation narrative. - SimonP 05:01, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

VfD[edit]

This page was one of a group of pages on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion; the result of voting was keep. For an archive of the debate, go here: Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Matthew_1. Antandrus (talk) 7 July 2005 02:40 (UTC)

POV[edit]

POV issues of this article is discussed at another in the series. See Talk:Matthew 1 ~~~~ 20:17, 9 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

survey[edit]

For a (now finished) July 2005 survey about whether or not the full source text should be included in the article see Wikipedia:Bible source text.

There were 36 non-abstaining votes, and 3 abstensions.

The result of the survey was a 70% vote that it should not be included in the text, and should be removed in favour of a link to the text at wikisource. ~~~~ 07:52, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]