Talk:Zhaozhou Congshen

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

dates[edit]

Zhaozhou's dates of birth and death are effectively unknown and the 119-year lifespan given by some sources is most unlikely. Jpatokal 04:55, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Maybe so, but I don't know if you'd call it 'unlikely', given that the relatively recent Ch'an master Hsu-Yun lived to 119. --Hidoshi 02:22, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)

As far as I know (told by my Zen teacher), Joshu entered the monastery being 20 years old. After studying 40 years under Nansen's guidance, he left the monastery to live as a travelling monk. This was quite common practice among ascending zen masters to further enhance their skills by meeting other masters. He finally founded his own monastery being 80 years old.--The Heinz 12:03, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mu vs Wu[edit]

Considering this article is about a Chinese monk, shouldn't "Wu" be used in place of "Mu"? It's not a huge difference, but it makes sense. --Hidoshi 05:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True, but mu is by far more common in what I've read. --Gwern (contribs) 16:52, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Granted, but we still have to deal with a cultural inconsistency. Just because it's more commonly called "Zen" doesn't mean we should address Chao-chou/Zhaozhou as a Zen master as opposed to a "Ch'an" master should we? -- Hidoshi 19:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have a point there. Let's be consistent and call him a Zen master - hardly anyone has heard of Ch'an. --Gwern (contribs) 20:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that was facetious, considering how many people are Chinese in the world. At any rate, I for one vote cultural consistency over known nomenclature. Ignorance on the part of the mass importer is no excuse to continue these inconsistencies. -- Hidoshi 22:50, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Given that Zhaozhou lived 1200 years ago, shouldn't we be using a word in medieval Chinese, rather than modern Mandarin? Whatever it was, it probably started with an [m].—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 06:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to this document, wu seems to have been pronounced something like mju back in them days. —Saposcat 08:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zhaozhou Congshen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160105065337/http://www.purdue.edu/crcs/itemPublications/articles/YangWei.pdf to http://www.purdue.edu/crcs/itemPublications/articles/YangWei.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:21, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]