Talk:Bath, North Carolina

Untitled

"total area of 2.7 km² (1.0 mi²). 0.9 km² (0.4 mi²) of it is land and 1.8 km² (0.7 mi²) of it is water. " How exactly does this work? 0.4 mi² + 0.7 mi² does not add up to 1.0 mi². I realize this is due to a round-off problem, but since the towm most likely was originally surveyed in miles, that total area measurement is more likely to be accurate- did these numbers get converted to square kilometers, then back to square miles?

This is a round-off problem. The total area probably is a little bit more than 1.0 square miles, maybe 1.04 miles (which was rounded of to 1.0). Maybe 0.37 square miles (rounded off to 0.4) is land and 0.67 square miles (rounded of to 0.7) is water. -- Robert Weemeyer 10:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Too much space given to Whitefield - other areas to explore

While Whitefield's curse is dramatic, there is little evidence it was effective. In the context of this article, too much space is given to him. What has been the relation of the town to the county? What was its economy during the slavery years? And after? The town has mostly white residents, but the county is nearly 30% black - what does that reflect? Higher costs in town? The state's major development has taken place in the Piedmont - Charlotte, Research Triangle, etc. Relation to that? Wilmington developed as larger; did it have a bigger harbor, closer access to more cotton plantations?Parkwells (talk) 17:37, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Bath, North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051112002105/http://www.ah.dcr.state.nc.us/sections/hs/bath/edna-ferber.htm to http://www.ah.dcr.state.nc.us/sections/hs/bath/edna-ferber.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051124085106/http://www.ah.dcr.state.nc.us:80/sections/hs/bath/bath.htm to http://www.ah.dcr.state.nc.us/sections/hs/bath/bath.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050909154640/http://circanceast.beaufortccc.edu:80/Bath/bath.htm to http://circanceast.beaufortccc.edu/Bath/bath.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)