User talk:Smithd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey Smithd :) I hope you like the place and choose to stay.

Some links that may be of use:

Just a tip, if you want to move a page, use the "Move page" feature on your sidebar; doing it that way preserves edit history. Thanks :) Dysprosia 06:37, 29 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Good Catch[edit]

Good catch on the Charles Musket article. Hard to believe it's been around for over a year without ever being questioned. -- HiEv 06:01, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I edit in History at Open Site sometimes, and saw it as a submission. After my fact checking I couldn't find any information about this character. That and the Ötzi the Iceman love affair pretty much sealed the deal! smithd 06:15, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Triviatown for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Triviatown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triviatown until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rorshacma (talk) 00:12, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Triviatown.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Triviatown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Joji Nagashima has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 20:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joji Nagashima for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joji Nagashima is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joji Nagashima until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 20:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]