Talk:The Last Juror

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I was under the impression that it was Hank Hooten, the ex-lover of Rhoda Kassellaw, and not Danny Padgitt who murdered two of the jury and injured a third.{{subst:unsigned|203.61.60.125|00:40, 11 January 2005 (UTC)

I think that "The Summmons" also takes place in Clanton, at least part of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.104.16.38 (talk) 04:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hank Hooten did not fire from the courtroom balcony. Ten feet above the balcony (which was full of people who had come to watch the court proceedings), there was a dropped ceiling that had been installed some years earlier in an attempt to improve the lighting. Between the dropped ceiling and the original ceiling there was a crawl space. It was in this space that Hooten concealed himself so that he could shoot Padgitt. Ref: pp488-489 of the Arrow paperback 2004 edition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.168.55.2 (talk) 22:39, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lastjuror.jpg[edit]

Image:Lastjuror.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who killed the jurors?[edit]

While it's strongly implied that it was Hooten and not Padgitt who killed the jurors, is it ever specifically stated? My reading is that we are intended to presume that it was Hooten, but never really told. After Hooten kills Padgitt and then himself, nobody really looks into which of the dead men was guilty of the two rifle murders and attempted bombing. 201.230.141.56 (talk) 02:41, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]