Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Groovy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Stormie 09:13, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
Captain Groovy[edit]
Band vanity which seems related to East 304, also on VfD. Xezbeth 14:44, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
- I'm always torn on indie bands. Where do we draw the line on notability? This article however isn't going places, and a Google search yields 537 hits, of which most isnt about this band. Delete. Inter 15:55, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable. - Mailer Diablo 18:48, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 23:42, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. My basic policy on bands is: if they haven't released an album, and aren't otherwise notable (being the most popular band in Wichita or having a "totally new sound" doesn't equate notablitly) they aren't notable enough for Wikipedia. -- Scott eiπ + 1 = 0 07:59, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Do Not Delete, East 304 will kick your ass if you delete this page.
- Ditto. BTW, I'm rather amused at the thought of having my ass kicked by a sockpuppet. First delete, then bring it on, meat!! - Lucky 6.9 18:23, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Do Not Delete If the purpose of the encyclopedia is to collect information about as many different aspects of the world as possible, to delete this page (which is not profane or libelous) would set a precedent dangerous to the aspirations of Wikipedia.
ElScorcho717[No such user --fvw*] - Delete --fvw* 23:35, 2005 Jan 26 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.