User talk:64.229.26.133

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires you to provide no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

  • The use of a username of your choice
  • The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link
  • Your own user page
  • Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address
  • The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you
  • The ability to rename pages
  • The ability to upload images
  • The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website
  • The eligibility to become an administrator
  • The right to be heard in formal votes and elections, and on pages like votes for deletion

Click here to create an account. --JYolkowski 00:10, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

--

Hi. Your "redhill creek expressway" stub seems to trail off in the middle of a sentence. Could you finish it off? AdamW 11:43, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Pacific Western Bus Lines, by SiobhanHansa (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Pacific Western Bus Lines fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Article does not assert the importance of the subject and no 3rd party, reliable sources were found for any encyclopedic information.


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Pacific Western Bus Lines, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:42, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Pacific Western Toronto Bus Lines, by SiobhanHansa (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Pacific Western Toronto Bus Lines fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Article does not assert the importance of the subject and no 3rd party, reliable sources were found for any encyclopedic information.


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Pacific Western Toronto Bus Lines, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:42, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Brimley Road[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Brimley Road, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brimley Road. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 03:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Birchmount Road[edit]

I have nominated Birchmount Road, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birchmount Road. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Islington Avenue for deletion[edit]

The article Islington Avenue is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islington Avenue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 22:27, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Victoria Park Avenue for deletion[edit]

The article Victoria Park Avenue is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Park Avenue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 22:30, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Birchmount Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Birchmount Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birchmount Road(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 20:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mary Corleone for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary Corleone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Corleone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Old JacobiteThe '45 15:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Victoria Park Avenue for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Victoria Park Avenue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Park Avenue (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Username6892 22:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Jane Street has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 6 § Jane Street until a consensus is reached. King of ♥ 20:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]