Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Baugh

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 23:27, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Mike Baugh

Non-notable. Vanity page? Delete. --Jtalledo (talk) 19:32, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• I suppose this is similar to listing all the actors on your favourite sitcom. Personally, I'd say if this is all they can say about him, he should be merged into the article of whoever it is that has employed him. Average Earthman 20:15, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Merge/Redirect into something. The JPS 21:11, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Um...according to the article, he's 11 years old. "Mike Baugh" +wrestler gets no google hits. I don't think this person even exists, or if they do, they're an 11-year old and certainly not a professional wrestler. Delete unless proven factual. Meelar (talk) 21:34, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
  • Oops, I missed that blatant clue (although it could be a typo meant to be 1984 I suppose). Average Earthman 22:24, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • An 11-year-old professional wrestler? Sheesh, right. Delete. — JIP | Talk 03:47, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax. --Carnildo 22:53, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, hoax. Probably someone showing their son wikipedia. Megan1967 02:19, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable or fake. -- Paulley 13:14, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.