This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Starsky & Hutch (film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

&[edit]

Untitled[edit]

Sorry to move the page yet again — but (movie) tag or no, the film still takes an ampersand. - Sara 06:18, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Huggy Bear cameo?[edit]

I think that the original Huggy Bear may have made a cameo at the end, where the original Starsky and Hutch are. I believe he's the one talking to the two prostitutes saying he is a personal friend of Huggy Bear, but I can't be sure. Anyone got any info on that? Spartacusprime 15:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Budget[edit]

that can't be right. this movie did not cost more than a billion dollars, plus those numbers are obviously fake. and theres a comma missing. fixit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.194.147.32 (talk) 04:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

Why is Ed Roney's opinion about this movie given his own paragraph. It also says almost nothing new about the general consensus on the movie. I believe it should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.222.146 (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]