Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ummo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was - kept

Ummo

Relisted per VfU guidelines. Keep. anthony 警告 14:31, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Keep, is noteworthy and interesting and presented in the appropriate manner for this type of content. [[User:GRider|GRider\^talk]] 19:08, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep Carter 21:48, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Description of a hoax. No apparent grounds for deletion. Dan100 10:45, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep - real as a UFO hoax and source of Sisters of Ummo cult in South America - Skysmith 08:20, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. The article does not present the hoax as a hoax but instead as fact or at least plausible. If this topic is in fact a UFO hoax as the keep-voters attest, then this article misserves the reader and taints Wikipedia's objectivity. - Keith D. Tyler [flame] 09:13, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
  • I agree the article needs an edit and that's a good reason for listing it on Cleanup or something, but not delete. Carter 16:03, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Then you won't object to a few more templates? :) - Keith D. Tyler [flame] 18:00, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
      • Not at all, and after the New Year, I might take a crack at a rewrite myself ... Carter 18:03, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Previous discussion

There was previously an article with the capitalized name "UMMO" (VFD discussion) which was deleted. I can't tell if this is a duplication of that same content, so I don't feel confident putting this on speedy. But if you were in the discussion, please inform this one. - [[User:KeithTyler|Keith D. Tyler [flame]]] 21:37, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)

• Yepper, it's a recreation. Speedily deleted. Geogre 22:34, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Note: The article was recreated again after the speedy delete by User:Graffity. Geogre 16:29, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• It seems to have been fixed. Keep. anthony 警告 19:23, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. It could stand some editing and maybe NPOV discussion, but it should still be kept. Carter 20:28, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. --Dittaeva 21:06, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.